Luthar Suniya S, Latendresse Shawn J
Department of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, Box 133, 525 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027-6696, USA.
Dev Psychopathol. 2005 Winter;17(1):207-30. doi: 10.1017/s095457940505011x.
This study was focused on contextual variations in the parenting dimensions salient for preadolescent adjustment. The sample consisted of 614 sixth graders from two communities, one low and the other high income. Parenting dimensions included those known to be significant in each socioeconomic context: isolation from parents (emotional and physical), and parents' emphasis on achievements (overall expectations and emphasis on integrity over success). Adjustment outcomes included subjective well-being as well as school competence. Contradicting stereotypes, results showed that on average, very affluent children can perceive their parents as emotionally and physically unavailable to the same degree that youth in serious poverty do. The ramifications for adjustment also seem to be largely similar: Closeness to parents was beneficial for all, just as criticism was deleterious. Even after considering the quality of parent-child relationships, parents' physical absence (e.g., at dinner) connoted vulnerability for distress and for poor school performance in both groups. The connotations of a few parenting dimensions varied by context and gender; these variations are discussed as are overall implications for future research and practice.
本研究聚焦于对青春期前儿童适应具有显著意义的养育维度的情境差异。样本包括来自两个社区的614名六年级学生,一个社区低收入,另一个社区高收入。养育维度包括在每个社会经济背景中已知具有重要意义的那些维度:与父母的疏离(情感和身体上的),以及父母对成就的强调(总体期望和对正直而非成功的强调)。适应结果包括主观幸福感和学业能力。与刻板印象相反,结果表明,平均而言,非常富裕的孩子认为他们的父母在情感和身体上无法陪伴他们的程度与严重贫困家庭的孩子相同。对适应的影响似乎也大致相似:与父母亲近对所有人都有益,批评则有害。即使考虑到亲子关系的质量,父母在身体上的缺席(例如晚餐时不在)对两组儿童的痛苦和学业成绩不佳都意味着易感性。一些养育维度的内涵因情境和性别而异;这些差异以及对未来研究和实践的总体影响将在文中进行讨论。