Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2022 Jun;25(2):300-315. doi: 10.1007/s10567-021-00369-x. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
Extant research has identified both objective measures of socioeconomic status (SES) and subjective social class (SSC) as important predictors of psychosocial outcomes in childhood and adolescence, particularly with regard to externalizing symptoms. Given the importance of the associations with SES and SSC, a more nuanced and integrated conceptual understanding of early pathways of vulnerability implicated in the development and maintenance of youth externalizing problems is warranted. Thus, this review will: (1) operationalize both SES and SSC and their current standards of measurement; (2) examine current literature describing their respective associations with a range of externalizing symptoms in both children and adolescents; (3) review current theoretical models connecting SES and SSC and youth development and the strengths and limitations of those approaches; (4) propose a new conceptual socioecological model situating the impact of SES and SSC on youth externalizing problems in the context of parents and peers as a framework to further integrate existing research and guide future work; and (5) discuss potential clinical implications at the intersection of this work.
现有研究已经确定,社会经济地位(SES)的客观衡量指标和主观社会阶层(SSC)都是儿童和青少年时期心理社会结果的重要预测因素,特别是对于外化症状。鉴于 SES 和 SSC 的关联非常重要,因此需要对涉及青年外化问题发展和维持的早期脆弱性的早期途径有更细致和综合的概念理解。因此,本综述将:(1)操作 SES 和 SSC 及其当前的测量标准;(2)研究目前描述 SES 和 SSC 与儿童和青少年一系列外化症状的各自关联的文献;(3)综述当前将 SES 和 SSC 与青年发展联系起来的理论模型,以及这些方法的优缺点;(4)提出一个新的社会生态概念模型,将 SES 和 SSC 对青年外化问题的影响置于父母和同伴的背景下,作为进一步整合现有研究和指导未来工作的框架;(5)讨论这方面工作的潜在临床意义。