Adone R, Ciuchini F, Marianelli C, Tarantino M, Pistoia C, Marcon G, Petrucci P, Francia M, Riccardi G, Pasquali P
Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Dipartimento di Sanità Alimentare ed Animale, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Infect Immun. 2005 Jul;73(7):4198-204. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.7.4198-4204.2005.
Vaccination against Brucella infections in animals is usually performed by administration of live attenuated smooth B. abortus strain S19 and B. melitensis strain Rev1. They are proven effective vaccines against B. abortus in cattle and against B. melitensis and B. ovis in sheep and goats, respectively. However, both vaccines have the main drawback of inducing O-polysaccharide-specific antibodies that interfere with serologic diagnosis of disease. In addition, they retain residual virulence, being a cause of abortion in pregnant animals and infection in humans. To overcome these problems, one approach is to develop defined rough mutant Brucella strains lacking O antigen of lipopolysaccharide. B. abortus rough strain RB51, a rifampin-resistant mutant of virulent strain B. abortus 2308, is used as a vaccine against B. abortus infection in cattle in some countries. However, RB51 is not effective in sheep, and there is only preliminary evidence that it is effective in goats. In this study, we tested the efficacies of six rifampin-resistant rough strains of B. melitensis in protecting BALB/c mice exposed to B. melitensis infection. The protective properties, as well as both humoral and cellular immune responses, were assessed in comparison with those provided by B. melitensis Rev1 and B. abortus RB51 vaccines. The results indicated that these rough mutants were able to induce a very good level of protection against B. melitensis infection, similar to that provided by Rev1 and superior to that of RB51, without inducing antibodies to O antigen. In addition, all B. melitensis mutants were able to stimulate good production of gamma interferon. The characteristics of these strains encourage further evaluation of them as alternative vaccines to Rev1 in primary host species.
动物布鲁氏菌感染的疫苗接种通常通过接种减毒活光滑型流产布鲁氏菌S19株和马尔他布鲁氏菌Rev1株来进行。它们分别被证明是针对牛流产布鲁氏菌、绵羊和山羊中马尔他布鲁氏菌及绵羊布鲁氏菌的有效疫苗。然而,这两种疫苗都有一个主要缺点,即会诱导O-多糖特异性抗体,干扰疾病的血清学诊断。此外,它们仍保留残余毒力,可导致怀孕动物流产和人类感染。为克服这些问题,一种方法是开发缺乏脂多糖O抗原的确定粗糙突变布鲁氏菌菌株。流产布鲁氏菌粗糙菌株RB51是强毒株流产布鲁氏菌2308的耐利福平突变株,在一些国家被用作牛抗流产布鲁氏菌感染的疫苗。然而,RB51对绵羊无效,仅有初步证据表明它对山羊有效。在本研究中,我们测试了6株耐利福平的马尔他布鲁氏菌粗糙菌株对暴露于马尔他布鲁氏菌感染的BALB/c小鼠的保护效果。与马尔他布鲁氏菌Rev1疫苗和流产布鲁氏菌RB51疫苗相比,评估了这些菌株的保护特性以及体液免疫和细胞免疫反应。结果表明,这些粗糙突变株能够诱导对马尔他布鲁氏菌感染的良好保护水平,与Rev1提供的保护水平相似且优于RB51,同时不会诱导产生O抗原抗体。此外,所有马尔他布鲁氏菌突变株都能够刺激γ干扰素的良好产生。这些菌株的特性促使人们进一步评估它们作为主要宿主物种中Rev1替代疫苗的可能性。