Ellington Lee, Wahab Stephanie, Sahami Martin Shadi, Field Rosemary, Mooney Kathleen H
College of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5850, USA.
Psychooncology. 2006 Apr;15(4):273-84. doi: 10.1002/pon.943.
Cancer randomized clinical trial (RCT) participation is low, particularly among ethnic and racial minorities. Hispanic enrollment is far below their representation in the US population, yet their cancer burden is higher. Little is known from the patient perspective about factors which influence the decision to enroll in RCTs. We asked Spanish- and English-speaking individuals what factors influence decisions about cancer RCT participation. Eight focus groups were conducted with 55 participants (25 Spanish and 30 English-speaking). The groups were taped, transcribed, and analyzed for themes. Six major themes emerged: patient-provider communication, personal relationship with provider, involvement of significant others in decision making, role of faith, need for information, and impact of discrimination on decision making. Both similarities (e.g. need for comprehensive information) and differences (e.g. need for provider acknowledgement of emotional and spiritual concerns) were found between Spanish- and English-speaking participants. Among Spanish-speaking participants, level of education was differentially related to decision-making themes. Implications for providers are discussed.
癌症随机临床试验(RCT)的参与率很低,尤其是在少数族裔和种族群体中。西班牙裔的入组率远低于他们在美国人口中的占比,然而他们的癌症负担却更高。从患者的角度来看,对于影响参与RCT决策的因素知之甚少。我们询问了讲西班牙语和英语的个体,哪些因素会影响他们参与癌症RCT的决策。我们组织了八个焦点小组,共有55名参与者(25名讲西班牙语的和30名讲英语的)。这些小组进行了录音、转录,并对主题进行了分析。出现了六个主要主题:医患沟通、与医生的个人关系、重要他人参与决策、信仰的作用、对信息的需求以及歧视对决策的影响。讲西班牙语和讲英语的参与者之间既有相似之处(例如对全面信息的需求),也有不同之处(例如需要医生认可情感和精神方面的担忧)。在讲西班牙语的参与者中,教育水平与决策主题存在不同程度的关联。文中还讨论了对医疗服务提供者的启示。