• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英语能力有限与乳腺癌患者医疗保健参与度的差异。

Limited English Proficiency and Disparities in Health Care Engagement Among Patients With Breast Cancer.

机构信息

Stanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA.

Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

出版信息

JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Dec;17(12):e1837-e1845. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.01093. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1200/OP.20.01093
PMID:33844591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810131/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Race and ethnicity have been shown to affect quality of cancer care, and patients with low English proficiency (LEP) have increased risk for serious adverse events. We sought to assess the impact of primary language on health care engagement as indicated by clinical trial screening and engagement, use of genetic counseling, and communication via an electronic patient portal.

METHODS

Clinical and demographic data on patients with breast cancer diagnosed and treated from 2013 to 2018 within the Stanford University Health Care system were compiled via linkage of electronic health records, an internal clinical trial database, and the California Cancer Registry. Logistic and linear regression models were used to evaluate for association of clinical trial engagement and patient portal message rates with primary language group.

RESULTS

Patients with LEP had significantly lower rates of clinical trial engagement compared with their English-speaking counterparts (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.29; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.51). Use of genetic counseling was similar between language groups. Rates of patient portal messaging did not differ between English-speaking and LEP groups on multivariable analysis; however, patients with LEP were less likely to have a portal account (adjusted OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.96). Among LEP subgroups, Spanish speakers were significantly less likely to engage with the patient portal compared with English speakers (estimated difference in monthly rate: OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.77).

CONCLUSION

We found that patients with LEP had lower rates of clinical trial engagement and odds of electronic patient portal enrollment. Interventions designed to overcome language and cultural barriers are essential to optimize the experience of patients with LEP.

摘要

目的

种族和民族已被证明会影响癌症治疗的质量,而英语水平较低(LEP)的患者发生严重不良事件的风险增加。我们旨在评估主要语言对临床研究筛选和参与、遗传咨询的使用以及通过电子患者门户进行沟通等医疗保健参与的影响。

方法

通过电子健康记录、内部临床试验数据库和加利福尼亚癌症登记处的链接,汇编了 2013 年至 2018 年期间在斯坦福大学医疗保健系统内诊断和治疗的乳腺癌患者的临床和人口统计学数据。使用逻辑和线性回归模型评估临床试验参与率和患者门户消息率与主要语言组之间的关联。

结果

与讲英语的患者相比,LEP 患者的临床试验参与率明显较低(调整后的优势比 [OR],0.29;95%置信区间,0.16 至 0.51)。语言组之间遗传咨询的使用情况相似。在多变量分析中,讲英语和 LEP 组之间患者门户消息的比率没有差异;然而,LEP 患者建立门户账户的可能性较低(调整后的 OR,0.89;95%置信区间,0.83 至 0.96)。在 LEP 亚组中,与讲英语的患者相比,西班牙语患者使用患者门户的可能性明显较低(估计每月差异率:OR,0.43;95%置信区间,0.24 至 0.77)。

结论

我们发现 LEP 患者的临床试验参与率和电子患者门户注册的可能性较低。旨在克服语言和文化障碍的干预措施对于优化 LEP 患者的体验至关重要。

相似文献

1
Limited English Proficiency and Disparities in Health Care Engagement Among Patients With Breast Cancer.英语能力有限与乳腺癌患者医疗保健参与度的差异。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Dec;17(12):e1837-e1845. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.01093. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
2
Participation of Patients With Limited English Proficiency in Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Trials.医学学术文献:《低英语水平患者参与妇科肿瘤临床试验》
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Jan;21(1):27-32.e2. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7068.
3
Engagement With a Health Information Technology-Augmented Self-Management Support Program in a Population With Limited English Proficiency: Observational Study.在英语水平有限的人群中使用健康信息技术增强的自我管理支持计划进行互动:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 May 11;9(5):e24520. doi: 10.2196/24520.
4
Adherence to Newly Prescribed Diabetes Medications Among Insured Latino and White Patients With Diabetes.参保的拉丁裔和白人糖尿病患者对新开具的糖尿病药物的依从性
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):371-379. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8653.
5
The Association of Limited English Proficiency With Morbidity and Mortality After Trauma.有限英语能力与创伤后发病率和死亡率的关系。
J Surg Res. 2022 Dec;280:326-332. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.044. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
6
Barriers to Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Among Patients with Cancer and Limited English Proficiency.癌症合并有限英语水平患者电子患者报告结局测量障碍。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2223898. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23898.
7
Limited English Proficiency and Sepsis Mortality by Race and Ethnicity.有限的英语水平和种族/民族的脓毒症死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2350373. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50373.
8
Increased Access to Professional Interpreters in the Hospital Improves Informed Consent for Patients with Limited English Proficiency.医院增加专业口译员的使用,可提高英语水平有限患者的知情同意率。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Aug;32(8):863-870. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-3983-4. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
9
Language barriers, physician-patient language concordance, and glycemic control among insured Latinos with diabetes: the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE).语言障碍、医患语言一致性与加利福尼亚北部糖尿病参保者的血糖控制:糖尿病研究(DISTANCE)。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Feb;26(2):170-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1507-6. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
10
Unmet Mental Health Need Among Chinese and Latino Primary Care Patients: Intersection of Ethnicity, Gender, and English Proficiency.中文和拉丁裔初级保健患者的未满足心理健康需求:种族、性别和英语水平的交集。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1245-1251. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05483-9. Epub 2019 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Telehealth Care for People With Serious Illnesses and Preferred Languages Other Than English.为重病患者及使用英语以外其他首选语言的人群提供的远程医疗服务。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2529880. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29880.
2
Using content validity index methodology for cross-cultural translation of a patient-reported outcome measure for head and neck cancer.运用内容效度指数方法对一项头颈癌患者报告结局指标进行跨文化翻译。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 20;5:1582127. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1582127. eCollection 2025.
3
Research coordinators' perspectives on recruitment of minoritized people with cystic fibrosis into clinical trials.研究协调员对招募患有囊性纤维化的少数族裔人群参与临床试验的看法。
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03707-9.
4
Digital Health Technology Use Among Spanish Speakers in the US: A Scoping Review.美国说西班牙语人群对数字健康技术的使用:一项范围综述
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2510386. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10386.
5
Inclusion of Participants With Non-English Language Preference in Heart Failure Clinical Trials.将非英语偏好的参与者纳入心力衰竭临床试验。
JACC Heart Fail. 2025 Mar 29:102436. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2025.03.003.
6
Advancing cancer care through digital access in the USA: a state-of-the-art review of patient portals in oncology.通过美国的数字接入推进癌症护理:肿瘤学患者门户网站的最新综述
BMJ Oncol. 2025 Jan 7;4(1):e000432. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000432. eCollection 2025.
7
Optimizing Mainstreaming of Genetic Testing in Parallel With Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer Tumor Testing: How Do We Maximize Our Impact?优化基因检测与卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌肿瘤检测并行的主流化:我们如何最大化我们的影响?
JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Dec;8:e2400525. doi: 10.1200/PO-24-00525. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
8
Research Coordinators' Perspectives on Recruitment of Minoritized People with Cystic Fibrosis into Clinical Trials.研究协调员对招募少数族裔囊性纤维化患者参与临床试验的看法。
Res Sq. 2024 Nov 13:rs.3.rs-5195002. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5195002/v1.
9
Mediators of racial and ethnic inequities in clinical trial participation among patients with cancer, 2011-2023.癌症患者参与临床试验中种族和民族不平等的中介因素,2011-2023 年。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Sep 2;8(5). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae085.
10
Catchment area and cancer population health research through a novel population-based statewide database: a scoping review.基于全州人群数据库的流域地区和癌症人群健康研究:一项范围综述。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Sep 2;8(5). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae066.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between patient-initiated emails and overall 2-year survival in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: Evidence from the real-world setting.患者主动发邮件与接受化疗的癌症患者 2 年总生存率的关联:来自真实环境的证据。
Cancer Med. 2020 Nov;9(22):8552-8561. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3483. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
2
Cancer Disparities and Health Equity: A Policy Statement From the American Society of Clinical Oncology.癌症差异与健康公平:美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 10;38(29):3439-3448. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00642. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
3
Association Between Limited English Proficiency and Revisits and Readmissions After Hospitalization for Patients With Acute and Chronic Conditions in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省多伦多市的急性和慢性病患者住院后复诊和再入院与英语能力有限的关联。
JAMA. 2019 Oct 22;322(16):1605-1607. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.13066.
4
A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient-Physician Non-English Language Concordance on Quality of Care and Outcomes.患者-医生非英语语言一致对医疗质量和结果的影响的系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1591-1606. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04847-5. Epub 2019 May 30.
5
Geographical, racial and socio-economic variation in life expectancy in the US and their impact on cancer relative survival.美国预期寿命的地理、种族和社会经济差异及其对癌症相对生存率的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 25;13(7):e0201034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201034. eCollection 2018.
6
Lessons in Integrating Shared Decision-Making Into Cancer Care.将共享决策纳入癌症护理中的经验教训。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Apr;14(4):229-235. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00019.
7
Lower trial participation by culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) cancer patients is largely due to language barriers.文化和语言背景多样(CALD)的癌症患者参与临床试验的比例较低,这在很大程度上是由于语言障碍。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;14(1):52-60. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12818. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
8
Patient-Clinician Communication: American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline.患者-临床医生沟通:美国临床肿瘤学会共识指南。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;35(31):3618-3632. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.2311. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
9
A comparison of rule-based and machine learning approaches for classifying patient portal messages.基于规则和机器学习方法在患者门户消息分类中的比较。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Sep;105:110-120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
10
The Role of Clinical Trial Participation in Cancer Research: Barriers, Evidence, and Strategies.临床试验参与在癌症研究中的作用:障碍、证据与策略
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:185-98. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_156686.