Suppr超能文献

提高研究参与多样性:患者对障碍、种族差异和社区作用的看法。

Improving diversity in study participation: Patient perspectives on barriers, racial differences and the role of communities.

机构信息

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, New Jersey, USA.

CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1979-1987. doi: 10.1111/hex.13554. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The lack of racial/ethnic diversity in research potentially limits the generalizability of findings to a broader population, highlighting the need for greater diversity and inclusion in clinical research. Qualitative research (i.e., focus groups) was conducted to identify (i) the potential motivators and barriers to study participation across different races and ethnicities; (ii) preferred delivery of education and information to support healthcare decision-making and the role of the community.

METHODS

Patient focus groups were conducted with 26 participants from the sponsor's Patient Engagement Research Councils selected through subjective sampling. Recruitment prioritized adequate representation across different race/ethnic groups. Participation was voluntary and participants underwent a confidential interview process before selection. Narrative analysis was used to identify themes and draw insights from interactions. Experienced research specialists identified emerging concepts, and these were tested against new observations. The frequency of each concept was examined to understand its importance.

RESULTS

Based on self-selected race/ethnicity, participants were divided into five focus groups (Groups: African American/Black: 2; Hispanic/Latino, Asian American, and white: 1 each) and were asked to share their experiences/opinions regarding the stated objectives. Barriers to study participation included: limited awareness of opportunities to participate in research, fears about changes in standard therapy, breaking cultural norms/stigma, religion-related concerns and mistrust of clinical research. Participants identified the importance of transparency by pharmaceutical companies and other entities to build trust and partnership and cited key roles that communities can play. The perceptions of the African American group regarding diversity/inclusion in research studies appeared to be different from other groups; a lack of trust in healthcare providers, concerns about historical instances of research abuse and the importance of prayer were cited.

CONCLUSION

This study provided insights into barriers to study participation, and also highlighted the need for pharmaceutical companies and other entities to authentically engage in strategies that build trust within communities to enhance recruitment among diverse populations.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The data collected in the present study was provided by the participants in the focus groups.

摘要

简介

研究中缺乏种族/民族多样性可能会限制研究结果在更广泛人群中的普遍性,这凸显了临床研究中需要更大的多样性和包容性。本研究采用定性研究(即焦点小组)来确定(i)不同种族和族裔参与研究的潜在动机和障碍;(ii)支持医疗保健决策和社区作用的教育和信息的首选传递方式。

方法

通过赞助商的患者参与研究委员会,采用主观抽样选择了 26 名参与者进行患者焦点小组。招募优先考虑不同种族/族裔群体的充分代表性。参与者是自愿参与的,在选择之前要经过机密的访谈过程。采用叙述性分析来识别主题,并从互动中汲取见解。经验丰富的研究专家确定了新兴概念,并针对新的观察结果对其进行了测试。检查了每个概念的频率,以了解其重要性。

结果

根据自我选择的种族/族裔,参与者被分为五个焦点小组(组:非裔美国人/黑人:2;西班牙裔/拉丁裔、亚裔美国人和白人:各 1),并被要求分享他们对既定目标的经验/意见。参与研究的障碍包括:对参与研究机会的认识有限,对标准治疗改变的恐惧,打破文化规范/耻辱感,与宗教有关的担忧和对临床研究的不信任。参与者认识到制药公司和其他实体的透明度对于建立信任和伙伴关系的重要性,并提到了社区可以发挥的关键作用。与其他群体相比,非裔美国人组对研究中多样性/包容性的看法似乎有所不同;他们对医疗服务提供者缺乏信任,对研究滥用的历史实例感到担忧,以及祈祷的重要性。

结论

本研究深入了解了参与研究的障碍,还强调了制药公司和其他实体需要真诚地参与建立社区内信任的策略,以增强在不同人群中的招募。

患者或公众贡献

本研究中收集的数据由焦点小组的参与者提供。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c46/9327876/a620746e96f7/HEX-25--g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验