Aders A, Aders H
Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005 Jun;33(3):336-44. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0503300309.
While there have been previous studies looking at patterns of litigation against anaesthetists overseas, there is little reported on the trends in Australia. This study was performed to ascertain current reporting rates of anaesthetic incidents, and from what areas these reports arise. Over the five years spanning January 1999 until December 2003, 1,231 adverse anaesthetic outcomes were reported to United Medical Protection by Australian anaesthetists. As in other studies, damage relating to airway instrumentation was the most frequently reported, comprising 261 incidents (21.8%). Complications related to epidural blockade were the next most common, accounting for 182 outcomes (15.2%). Other common areas generating incident reports included nerve injuries, respiratory complications, drug side-effects and death. To date 147 claims (12.3%) have arisen from these incident reports. Knowledge of these areas of risk should translate into more effective risk management with reduction in claims and adverse patient outcomes.
虽然此前已有针对海外麻醉医生的诉讼模式的研究,但关于澳大利亚的趋势却鲜有报道。本研究旨在确定麻醉事件的当前报告率,以及这些报告来自哪些领域。在1999年1月至2003年12月的五年间,澳大利亚麻醉医生向联合医疗保护组织报告了1231例不良麻醉结果。与其他研究一样,与气道器械操作相关的损害报告最为频繁,共261例(21.8%)。硬膜外阻滞相关并发症次之,占182例结果(15.2%)。产生事件报告的其他常见领域包括神经损伤、呼吸并发症、药物副作用和死亡。迄今为止,这些事件报告引发了147起索赔(12.3%)。了解这些风险领域应能转化为更有效的风险管理,减少索赔和不良患者结局。