Suppr超能文献

儿科尾端添加剂:咪达唑仑、氯胺酮和新斯的明与布比卡因联合使用的比较

Caudal additives in pediatrics: a comparison among midazolam, ketamine, and neostigmine coadministered with bupivacaine.

作者信息

Kumar P, Rudra A, Pan A K, Acharya A

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Calcutta National Medical College, Kolkata, India.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2005 Jul;101(1):69-73, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000153862.95153.2E.

Abstract

Single-shot "kiddie caudal" with bupivacaine alone is losing popularity because of its duration of 4-8 h. In a prospective randomized double-blind clinical study, we assessed and compared the efficacy of ketamine, midazolam, and neostigmine coadministered with bupivacaine in a caudal epidural to provide intraoperative and postoperative pain relief. Eighty children (ASA status I) aged 5-10 yr undergoing unilateral inguinal herniotomy were allocated randomly in equal numbers (n = 20) into 4 groups to receive a caudal injection of 0.25% bupivacaine (1 mL/kg) with or without ketamine (0.5 mg/kg), midazolam (50 microg/kg), and neostig-mine (2 microg/kg), after the induction of standardized general anesthesia without premedication. Monitoring for pain, sedation, postoperative nausea/vomiting, dizziness, and pruritus was performed by anesthesiologists blinded to the study allocation. The time to first analgesic administration (paracetamol syrup) was longer (P < 0.05) in the bupivacaine-neostigmine group and the bupivacaine-midazolam group than in the other groups. Undesirable effects, such as emesis, pruritus, and dizziness, were comparable in all groups. However, the incidence of hallucination was more frequent in the bupivacaine-ketamine group compared with the other groups. This study shows that single-shot caudal coadministration of bupivacaine-neostigmine and bupivacaine-midazolam was associated with an extended duration of postoperative pain relief.

摘要

单纯使用布比卡因的单次“小儿骶管阻滞”因其持续时间为4 - 8小时而逐渐失宠。在一项前瞻性随机双盲临床研究中,我们评估并比较了氯胺酮、咪达唑仑和新斯的明与布比卡因联合用于骶管硬膜外麻醉以提供术中和术后疼痛缓解的效果。80名年龄在5 - 10岁、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I级、接受单侧腹股沟疝修补术的儿童被随机平均分为4组(n = 20),在未进行术前用药的标准化全身麻醉诱导后,接受骶管注射0.25%布比卡因(1 mL/kg),其中两组分别加用氯胺酮(0.5 mg/kg)、咪达唑仑(50 μg/kg)和新斯的明(2 μg/kg)。由对研究分组不知情的麻醉医师对疼痛、镇静、术后恶心/呕吐、头晕和瘙痒进行监测。布比卡因 - 新斯的明组和布比卡因 - 咪达唑仑组首次给予镇痛药物(对乙酰氨基酚糖浆)的时间比其他组更长(P < 0.05)。所有组中呕吐、瘙痒和头晕等不良影响相当。然而,布比卡因 - 氯胺酮组幻觉的发生率比其他组更高。本研究表明,布比卡因 - 新斯的明和布比卡因 - 咪达唑仑单次骶管联合给药与术后疼痛缓解时间延长相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验