Suppr超能文献

咪达唑仑用于儿童骶管镇痛:与布比卡因骶管给药的比较。

Midazolam for caudal analgesia in children: comparison with caudal bupivacaine.

作者信息

Pradhan B, Bajracharya G R

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal.

出版信息

Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2008 Apr-Jun;6(2):166-72.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Caudal analgesia is the most popular and commonly used regional anaesthesia technique for post operative analgesia in children undergoing lower limb, anoperineal and abdominal surgical procedures. It is commonly applied in all the paediatric patients undergoing the above mentioned surgery, as the goal of balanced anaesthesia is not only limited to intraoperative period but also good analgesia in post operative period. Many drugs like morphine, Pethidine, Neostigmine etc have been used as analgesic agent via the caudal route but not without their side effects. So Midazolam was used as an alternative drug as it may not be associated with the side effects encountered with the other drugs.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to see the analgesic efficacy of caudal administration of Midazolam with comparison to Bupivacaine for post operative analgesia, and to observe for side effects if any.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single blinded prospective observational study in children of age 1 to 6 years of ASA grade I undergoing elective hernia or hydrocoele surgery. The patients were allocated randomly into two groups (n=25) to receive caudal injection of either 0.25% Bupivacaine 1 ml/kg (group A) or Midazolam 50 microg/kg with normal saline 1 ml/kg (group B). In the post operative period heart rate, blood pressure, pain score, recovery to first analgesic time, total number of analgesics required in 24 hours and side effects if any were noted and analysed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in quality of pain relief, postoperative behaviour or analgesic requirements between the Midazolam group and the Bupivacaine group. Recovery to first analgesic time though was longer in the Bupivacaine group (9.65 hr) than Midazolam group (7.32 hr); it was statistically not significant (P= 0.9). Any of the side effects such as motor weakness, urinary retention, and respiratory depression were not observed in both the groups. However in both the groups, few of the patients had post operative vomiting.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that caudal Midazolam in a dose of 50 microg/kg provides equivalent analgesia to Bupivacaine 0.25%, when administered in a volume of 1 ml/kg for children undergoing unilateral inguinal herniotomy for hernia or high ligation of processus vaginalis for hydrocoele.

摘要

背景

骶管阻滞是用于下肢、肛门会阴及腹部手术患儿术后镇痛最常用的区域麻醉技术。它常用于所有接受上述手术的儿科患者,因为平衡麻醉的目标不仅局限于手术期,还包括术后良好的镇痛效果。许多药物如吗啡、哌替啶、新斯的明等已被用作通过骶管途径的镇痛剂,但都有其副作用。因此,咪达唑仑被用作替代药物,因为它可能不会出现与其他药物相关的副作用。

目的

本研究的目的是观察骶管注射咪达唑仑与布比卡因相比用于术后镇痛的效果,并观察是否有副作用。

材料与方法

这是一项针对1至6岁、ASA分级为I级、接受择期疝气或鞘膜积液手术患儿的单盲前瞻性观察研究。将患者随机分为两组(n = 25),分别接受骶管注射0.25%布比卡因1 ml/kg(A组)或咪达唑仑50μg/kg加生理盐水1 ml/kg(B组)。在术后期间,记录并分析心率、血压、疼痛评分、首次恢复镇痛时间、24小时内所需镇痛剂总数以及是否有副作用。

结果

咪达唑仑组和布比卡因组在疼痛缓解质量、术后行为或镇痛需求方面无显著差异。虽然布比卡因组的首次恢复镇痛时间(9.65小时)比咪达唑仑组(7.32小时)长,但在统计学上无显著差异(P = 0.9)。两组均未观察到运动无力、尿潴留和呼吸抑制等副作用。然而,两组中均有少数患者术后出现呕吐。

结论

我们得出结论,对于接受单侧腹股沟疝修补术或鞘膜积液鞘状突高位结扎术的儿童,以1 ml/kg的体积给予50μg/kg剂量的骶管咪达唑仑可提供与0.25%布比卡因等效的镇痛效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验