Pandey Chandra Kant, Raza Mehdi, Tripathi Mukesh, Navkar Deepa V, Kumar Abhishek, Singh Uttam K
Department of Anaesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India.
Anesth Analg. 2005 Jul;101(1):220-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000152186.89020.36.
We evaluated the effects of gabapentin and carbamazepine for pain relief in 36 Guillain-Barré syndrome patients. Patients were randomly assigned to receive gabapentin 300 mg, carbamazepine 100 mg, or matching placebo 3 times a day for 7 days. Fentanyl 2 microg/kg was used as a supplementary analgesic on patient demand. The pain score was recorded by using a numeric pain rating scale of 0-10, and sedation was recorded with a Ramsay sedation scale of 1-6 before medications were given and then at 6-h intervals throughout the study period. Total daily fentanyl consumption was recorded each day for each patient. The results of the study demonstrated that patients in the gabapentin group had significantly lower (P < 0.05) median numeric pain rating scale scores (3.5, 2.5, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, and 2.0) compared with patients in the placebo group (6.0, 6.0, 6.0, 6.0, 6.0, 6.0, and 6.0) and the carbamazepine group (6.0, 6.0, 5.0, 4.0, 4.0, 3.5, and 3.0). There was no significant difference in fentanyl consumption between the gabapentin and carbamazepine groups on Day 1 (340.1 +/- 34.3 microg and 347.5 +/- 38.0 microg, respectively), but consumption was significantly less in these 2 groups compared with the placebo group (590.4 +/- 35.0 microg) (P < 0.05). For the rest of the study period, there was a significant difference in fentanyl consumption among all treatment groups, and it was minimal in the gabapentin group (P < 0.05). We conclude that gabapentin is more effective than carbamazepine for decreasing pain and fentanyl consumption.
我们评估了加巴喷丁和卡马西平对36例吉兰-巴雷综合征患者疼痛缓解的效果。患者被随机分配,每天3次服用加巴喷丁300毫克、卡马西平100毫克或匹配的安慰剂,共7天。根据患者需求,使用2微克/千克的芬太尼作为辅助镇痛药。在给药前以及整个研究期间每隔6小时,使用0至10的数字疼痛评分量表记录疼痛评分,并用1至6的 Ramsay 镇静量表记录镇静情况。记录每位患者每天的芬太尼总消耗量。研究结果表明,与安慰剂组(6.0、6.0、6.0、6.0、6.0、6.0和6.0)和卡马西平组(6.0、6.0、5.0、4.0、4.0、3.5和3.0)相比,加巴喷丁组患者的数字疼痛评分量表中位数得分显著更低(P < 0.05)(3.5、2.5、2.0、2.0、2.0、2.0和2.0)。第1天,加巴喷丁组和卡马西平组的芬太尼消耗量无显著差异(分别为340.1±34.3微克和347.5±38.0微克),但这两组的消耗量与安慰剂组(590.4±35.0微克)相比显著更低(P < 0.05)。在研究的其余时间段,所有治疗组的芬太尼消耗量存在显著差异,加巴喷丁组的消耗量最低(P < 0.05)。我们得出结论,在减轻疼痛和减少芬太尼消耗量方面,加巴喷丁比卡马西平更有效。