• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病例对照研究中有序反应的回忆偏倚调查与校正

The investigation and correction of recall bias for an ordinal response in a case-control study.

作者信息

Barry Daniel, Livingstone Victoria

机构信息

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2006 Mar 30;25(6):965-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.2238.

DOI:10.1002/sim.2238
PMID:15977299
Abstract

Consider a case-control study designed to investigate the possible association between development of a particular disease and the value of a putative risk factor measured on an ordinal scale. Let E denote a subject's true risk factor value and let E* denote a subject's recorded risk factor value. Misclassification bias occurs if conclusions reached regarding the relationship between disease status and E* do not also apply to the relationship between disease status and E. We propose a model for the conditional probability distribution of E* given E. We show how the model may be used to investigate misclassification bias in a validation study where measurements of E* and E are available for both cases and controls and apply the methods developed to data from a test-retest study of recall bias in the context of screening for hypertension. We also consider a situation where the validation study is carried out on a subset of the subjects within a larger case-control study. In that case, values for E* are available for all subjects but values for E are available only for those subjects included in the validation study. We show how correct likelihood-based inference concerning association between disease status and risk factor value may be carried out using all of the available data. A Monte Carlo study shows how the inclusion of a validation study leads to a correction of recall bias problems at the cost of an increased standard error for the estimated association parameter.

摘要

考虑一项病例对照研究,旨在调查某一特定疾病的发生与按有序尺度测量的假定风险因素值之间的可能关联。设E表示受试者的真实风险因素值,E表示受试者记录的风险因素值。如果关于疾病状态与E之间关系得出的结论不适用于疾病状态与E之间的关系,就会出现错误分类偏倚。我们提出了一个给定E时E的条件概率分布模型。我们展示了该模型如何用于在验证研究中调查错误分类偏倚,在该研究中病例和对照的E和E测量值均可用,并将所开发的方法应用于高血压筛查背景下回忆偏倚的重测研究数据。我们还考虑了在一个更大的病例对照研究中的一部分受试者上进行验证研究的情况。在那种情况下,所有受试者的E*值可用,但只有验证研究中包含的那些受试者的E值可用。我们展示了如何使用所有可用数据对疾病状态与风险因素值之间的关联进行基于似然性的正确推断。一项蒙特卡罗研究表明,纳入验证研究如何以估计关联参数的标准误差增加为代价,导致回忆偏倚问题得到校正。

相似文献

1
The investigation and correction of recall bias for an ordinal response in a case-control study.病例对照研究中有序反应的回忆偏倚调查与校正
Stat Med. 2006 Mar 30;25(6):965-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.2238.
2
Differential recall bias and spurious associations in case/control studies.病例对照研究中的差异性回忆偏倚和虚假关联。
Stat Med. 1996 Dec 15;15(23):2603-16. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19961215)15:23<2603::AID-SIM371>3.0.CO;2-G.
3
The effects of recall errors and of selection bias in epidemiologic studies of mobile phone use and cancer risk.在手机使用与癌症风险的流行病学研究中回忆误差和选择偏倚的影响。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2006 Jul;16(4):371-84. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500509. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
4
Accounting for error due to misclassification of exposures in case-control studies of gene-environment interaction.在基因-环境相互作用的病例对照研究中,考虑暴露因素误分类导致的误差。
Stat Med. 2008 Jul 10;27(15):2756-83. doi: 10.1002/sim.3044.
5
Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.长期暴露于交通相关空气污染对荷兰呼吸道和心血管疾病死亡率的影响:荷兰长期队列空气污染研究(NLCS-AIR研究)
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 Mar(139):5-71; discussion 73-89.
6
Proper interpretation of non-differential misclassification effects: expectations vs observations.非差异性错误分类效应的正确解读:期望与观察结果
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;34(3):680-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi060. Epub 2005 Mar 31.
7
Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.在没有金标准的情况下对ROC曲线进行非参数估计。
Biometrics. 2005 Jun;61(2):600-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00324.x.
8
Modeling late entry bias in survival analysis.生存分析中晚期进入偏倚的建模
Biometrics. 2005 Jun;61(2):559-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00325.x.
9
A simulation study of control sampling methods for nested case-control studies of genetic and molecular biomarkers and prostate cancer progression.针对遗传和分子生物标志物与前列腺癌进展的巢式病例对照研究的对照抽样方法的模拟研究。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Mar;18(3):706-11. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0839. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
10
Correction for regression dilution bias using replicates from subjects with extreme first measurements.使用首次测量值极端的受试者的重复测量数据对回归稀释偏倚进行校正。
Stat Med. 2007 May 10;26(10):2246-57. doi: 10.1002/sim.2698.

引用本文的文献

1
The Association between Tea Consumption and Bladder Cancer Risk Based on the Bladder Cancer Epidemiology and Nutritional Determinants (BLEND) International Consortium.基于膀胱癌流行病学与营养决定因素(BLEND)国际联盟的饮茶与膀胱癌风险之间的关联
Nutr Cancer. 2025;77(6):687-698. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2025.2488063. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
2
Dietary patterns and risk for gastric cancer: A case-control study in residents of the Huaihe River Basin, China.饮食模式与胃癌风险:中国淮河流域居民的一项病例对照研究
Front Nutr. 2023 Jan 23;10:1118113. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1118113. eCollection 2023.
3
Effect of Dietary Salt Intake on Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies.
膳食盐摄入量与胃癌风险的关系:病例对照研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2022 Oct 12;14(20):4260. doi: 10.3390/nu14204260.
4
The association between coffee consumption and bladder cancer in the bladder cancer epidemiology and nutritional determinants (BLEND) international pooled study.咖啡摄入与膀胱癌的关联:膀胱癌流行病学和营养决定因素(BLEND)国际汇总研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Aug;30(8):859-870. doi: 10.1007/s10552-019-01191-1. Epub 2019 May 30.
5
Re: Lifestyle and bladder cancer prevention: no consistent evidence from cohort studies.关于:生活方式与膀胱癌预防:队列研究无一致证据。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;32(11):1037-1038. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0307-2. Epub 2017 Sep 19.