Bourke C A, White J G
NSW Agriculture, Orange Agricultural Institute, Forest Road, Orange, New South Wales.
Aust Vet J. 2004 Nov;82(11):707-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2004.tb12165.x.
To investigate the clinical effect of administering sufficient Hypericum perforatum to cattle to deliver quadruple the reported oral toxic dose.
Thirty-six yearling Hereford (n = 18) and Angus (n = 18) steers.
A series of six experiments was conducted, each using 12 animals in a 2 x 2 factorial design, with two breeds of cattle (Hereford, Angus) and two dose levels of hypericin, 1.5 mg/kg (treated group) and 0 mg/kg (control group). Each set of 12 steers was used in duplicate experiments, with all animals alternated between treated and control groups.
Treated groups received finely milled H. perforatum administered orally in gelatin capsules to provide 1.5 mg hypericin/kg body weight. All cattle were then exposed to direct sunlight for 5 h per day for 5 successive days. Rectal temperatures were measured immediately before and at the end of each sunlight exposure session. Rectal temperature above 40 degrees C, together with some other clinical sign of hypericin poisoning, was considered indicative of intoxication.
No animals developed a rectal temperature above 40 degrees C or other clinical signs of hypericin poisoning.
While the reported bovine oral toxic dose of 3 g dried plant/kg body weight, for flowering stage, presumed narrow leaved biotype, H. perforatum, is probably correct, the corresponding dose for hypericin of 0.37 mg/kg is incorrect. Based on its known concentration in this plant the toxic dose of hypericin for partially pigmented Hereford-cross cattle is estimated at about 10.5 mg/kg body weight and more than this for fully pigmented cattle. This would imply that cattle of the former type should be about three and a half times better protected against H. perforatum toxicity than are unpigmented, wool protected, Merino sheep. Cattle, particularly if fully pigmented, may have a role in grazing management to control H. perforatum.
研究给牛投喂四倍于报告口服毒性剂量的贯叶连翘的临床效果。
36头一岁的赫里福德牛(n = 18)和安格斯牛(n = 18)公牛。
进行了一系列六项实验,每项实验采用2×2析因设计,使用12只动物,涉及两种牛品种(赫里福德牛、安格斯牛)和两种金丝桃素剂量水平,即1.5毫克/千克(处理组)和0毫克/千克(对照组)。每组12头公牛用于重复实验,所有动物在处理组和对照组之间交替。
处理组接受以明胶胶囊口服给药的精细研磨的贯叶连翘,以提供1.5毫克金丝桃素/千克体重。然后所有牛连续5天每天暴露于直射阳光下5小时。在每次阳光照射时段开始前和结束时立即测量直肠温度。直肠温度高于40摄氏度,以及其他一些金丝桃素中毒的临床症状,被认为表明中毒。
没有动物出现直肠温度高于40摄氏度或其他金丝桃素中毒的临床症状。
虽然报告的开花期窄叶生物型贯叶连翘的牛口服毒性剂量为3克干燥植物/千克体重可能是正确的,但相应的金丝桃素剂量0.37毫克/千克是不正确的。根据其在该植物中的已知浓度,部分有色的赫里福德杂交牛的金丝桃素毒性剂量估计约为10.5毫克/千克体重,对于完全有色的牛则更高。这意味着前一种类型的牛对贯叶连翘毒性的抵抗力应该比无色素、有羊毛保护的美利奴羊高三倍半左右。牛,特别是如果完全有色,可能在放牧管理中对控制贯叶连翘发挥作用。