Leiner T, de Haan M W, Nelemans P J, van Engelshoven J M A, Vasbinder G B C
Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Hospital, Peter Debijelaan 25, Maastricht, 6229, The Netherlands.
Eur Radiol. 2005 Nov;15(11):2219-29. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2826-6. Epub 2005 Jun 28.
Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a potentially curable cause of renovascular hypertension (RVH) and is caused by either atherosclerosis or fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) in the vast majority of patients. Although intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA) is still considered the standard of reference test for the anatomical diagnosis of RAS, noninvasive techniques such as MR angiography, CT angiography, and color-aided duplex ultrasonography are promising alternatives that also allow functional characterization of RAS. We provide an overview of these techniques and discuss their relative merits and shortcomings. Analysis of high-quality studies shows that both MR and CT angiography are significantly more accurate for the diagnosis of at least 50% atherosclerotic RAS than ultrasonographic techniques. The primary strength of ultrasonography at present is its suggested ability to predict functional recovery based on preinterventional resistance index measurements. A still unresolved issue is the detection of FMD. Because missing RVH may have serious consequences the most important requirement for a screening test is that it has high sensitivity.
肾动脉狭窄(RAS)是肾血管性高血压(RVH)的一个潜在可治愈病因,绝大多数患者是由动脉粥样硬化或纤维肌发育异常(FMD)引起的。尽管动脉内数字减影血管造影(IA-DSA)仍然被认为是RAS解剖诊断的参考标准检查,但磁共振血管造影、CT血管造影和彩色辅助双功超声等非侵入性技术是很有前景的替代方法,它们还能对RAS进行功能特征分析。我们概述了这些技术,并讨论了它们各自的优缺点。高质量研究分析表明,磁共振血管造影和CT血管造影在诊断至少50%的动脉粥样硬化性RAS方面比超声技术明显更准确。目前超声检查的主要优势在于其基于介入前阻力指数测量预测功能恢复的能力。一个尚未解决的问题是FMD的检测。由于漏诊RVH可能会产生严重后果,筛查试验最重要的要求是具有高灵敏度。