文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

一项在幽门螺杆菌阴性的基层医疗消化不良患者中比较奥美拉唑、雷尼替丁、西沙必利或安慰剂的随机试验:CADET-HN研究。

A randomized trial comparing omeprazole, ranitidine, cisapride, or placebo in helicobacter pylori negative, primary care patients with dyspepsia: the CADET-HN Study.

作者信息

Veldhuyzen van Zanten Sander J O, Chiba Naoki, Armstrong David, Barkun Alan, Thomson Alan, Smyth Sandra, Escobedo Sergio, Lee Joanna, Sinclair Paul

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jul;100(7):1477-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40280.x.


DOI:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40280.x
PMID:15984968
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of Helicobacter pylori negative patients with dyspepsia in primary care has not been studied in placebo-controlled studies. METHODS: H. pylori negative patients with dyspepsia symptoms of at least moderate severity (> or =4 on a seven-point Likert scale) were recruited from 35 centers. Patients were randomized to a 4-wk treatment of omeprazole 20 mg od, ranitidine 150 mg bid, cisapride 20 mg bid, or placebo, followed by on-demand therapy for an additional 5 months. Treatment success was defined as no or minimal symptoms (score < or = 2 out of 7), and was assessed after 4 wk and at 6 months. RESULTS: Five hundred and twelve patients were randomized and included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. At 4 wk, success rates (95% CI) were: omeprazole 51% (69/135; 43-60%), ranitidine 36% (50/139, 28-44%), cisapride 31% (32/105, 22-39%), and placebo 23% (31/133, 16-31%). Omeprazole was significantly better than all other treatments (p < 0.05). The proportion of patients who were responders at 4 wk and at 6 months was significantly greater for those receiving omeprazole 31% (42/135, 23-39%) compared with cisapride 13% (14/105, 7-20%), and placebo 14% (18/133, 8-20%) (p= 0.001), but not ranitidine 21% (29/139, 14-27%) (p= 0.053). The mean number of on-demand study tablets consumed and rescue antacid used was comparable across groups. Economic analysis showed a trade-off between superior efficacy and increased cost between omeprazole and ranitidine. CONCLUSION: Treatment with omeprazole provides superior symptom relief compared to ranitidine, cisapride, and placebo in the treatment of H. pylori negative primary care dyspepsia patients.

摘要

背景:在初级保健中,针对幽门螺杆菌阴性的消化不良患者的管理尚未在安慰剂对照研究中得到研究。 方法:从35个中心招募了幽门螺杆菌阴性且消化不良症状至少为中度严重程度(在七点李克特量表上≥4分)的患者。患者被随机分配接受为期4周的治疗,治疗药物分别为:奥美拉唑20毫克每日一次、雷尼替丁150毫克每日两次、西沙必利20毫克每日两次或安慰剂,随后进行为期5个月的按需治疗。治疗成功定义为无或仅有轻微症状(评分≤2分(满分7分)),并在4周和6个月后进行评估。 结果:512名患者被随机分组并纳入意向性治疗(ITT)分析。在4周时,成功率(95%置信区间)分别为:奥美拉唑51%(69/135;43 - 60%)、雷尼替丁36%(50/139,28 - 44%)、西沙必利31%(32/105,22 - 39%)和安慰剂23%(31/133,16 - 31%)。奥美拉唑明显优于所有其他治疗方法(p < 0.05)。与接受西沙必利治疗的患者13%(14/105,7 - 20%)和接受安慰剂治疗的患者14%(18/133,8 - 20%)相比,接受奥美拉唑治疗的患者在4周和6个月时出现反应的比例明显更高(31%(42/135,23 - 39%))(p = 0.001),但与接受雷尼替丁治疗的患者21%(29/139,14 - 27%)相比无显著差异(p = 0.053)。各组按需服用的研究药物片数和使用的急救抗酸剂数量均值相当。经济分析表明,奥美拉唑和雷尼替丁在疗效优势和成本增加之间存在权衡。 结论:在治疗幽门螺杆菌阴性的初级保健消化不良患者方面,与雷尼替丁、西沙必利和安慰剂相比,奥美拉唑治疗能更有效地缓解症状。

相似文献

[1]
A randomized trial comparing omeprazole, ranitidine, cisapride, or placebo in helicobacter pylori negative, primary care patients with dyspepsia: the CADET-HN Study.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2005-7

[2]
Treatment of uninvestigated dyspepsia with cisapride for patients with negative Helicobacter pylori serologies.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2000-9

[3]
Cisapride compared with ranitidine in the treatment of functional dyspepsia.

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995-5

[4]
A double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2002-12

[5]
Lack of effect of Helicobacter pylori on symptom improvement with a prokinetic medication, cisapride, in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia.

J Med Assoc Thai. 2005-5

[6]
Empiric treatment with high and standard dose of omeprazole in general practice: two-week randomized placebo-controlled trial and 12-month follow-up of health-care consumption.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2004-6

[7]
Proton pump inhibitor or testing for Helicobacter pylori as the first step for patients presenting with dyspepsia? A cluster-randomized trial.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2006-6

[8]
Heartburn-dominant, uninvestigated dyspepsia: a comparison of 'PPI-start' and 'H2-RA-start' management strategies in primary care--the CADET-HR Study.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005-5-15

[9]
Quality of life during acute and intermittent treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with omeprazole compared with ranitidine. Results from a multicentre clinical trial. The European Study Group.

Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998-2

[10]
A comparison of five maintenance therapies for reflux esophagitis.

N Engl J Med. 1995-10-26

引用本文的文献

[1]
Efficacy of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BL-99 in the treatment of functional dyspepsia: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Nat Commun. 2024-1-3

[2]
Factors associated with mood disorders and the efficacy of the targeted treatment of functional dyspepsia: A randomized clinical trial.

Front Med (Lausanne). 2022-7-22

[3]
Comparison of a Novel Herbal Medicine and Omeprazole in the Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.

Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020-11-12

[4]
Safety assessment of omeprazole use: a review.

Sao Paulo Med J. 2018

[5]
Efficacy of acupuncture versus sham acupuncture for postprandial distress syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Trials. 2019-1-18

[6]
Management of functional dyspepsia: state of the art and emerging therapies.

Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2018-1

[7]
Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-11-21

[8]
Acupuncture for postprandial distress syndrome (APDS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Trials. 2017-11-13

[9]
ACG and CAG Clinical Guideline: Management of Dyspepsia.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2017-6-20

[10]
Endoscopy-Guided Evaluation of Duodenal Mucosal Permeability in Functional Dyspepsia.

Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2017-4-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索