Suppr超能文献

与雷尼替丁相比,使用奥美拉唑对胃食管反流病进行急性和间歇性治疗期间的生活质量。一项多中心临床试验的结果。欧洲研究小组。

Quality of life during acute and intermittent treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with omeprazole compared with ranitidine. Results from a multicentre clinical trial. The European Study Group.

作者信息

Wiklund I, Bardhan K D, Müller-Lissner S, Bigard M A, Bianchi Porro G, Ponce J, Hosie J, Scott M, Weir D, Fulton C, Gillon K, Peacock R

机构信息

Astra Hässle AB, Mölndal, Sweden.

出版信息

Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998 Feb;30(1):19-27.

PMID:9615259
Abstract

AIMS

To investigate quality of life in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

PATIENTS

A series of 704 patients were randomised to treatment with ranitidine 150 mg bd, omeprazole 10 mg om or omeprazole 20 mg om for 2 weeks. Asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients were followed for 12 months.

METHODS

The Psychological General Well-Being index and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale were completed before and during short-term and intermittent treatment.

RESULTS

The quality of life response rate was > 80%. The majority of the patients receiving omeprazole 20 mg om (55%) had symptom relief after 2 weeks despite the fact that more patients on ranitidine required 4 weeks' treatment and an increased dose. There was no difference in the reflux dimension of Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale between treatments in the initial treatment phase, but the total Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale score improved significantly more on omeprazole 10 mg om than on ranitidine 150 mg bd (p = 0.006). Both doses of omeprazole improved the total Psychological General Well-Being score more than ranitidine (omeprazole 10 mg om versus ranitidine 150 mg bd, p = 0.005, omeprazole 20 mg om versus ranitidine 150 mg bd, p = 0.031). During follow-up, relapsing patients returned to pre-treatment symptom and well-being scores, but these dimensions were restored after treatment.

CONCLUSION

The quality of life is impaired in patients presenting with reflux symptoms. Irrespective of whether the patients presented with endoscopy positive or endoscopy negative reflux disease, treatment on demand improved the quality of life.

摘要

目的

研究胃食管反流病患者的生活质量。

患者

704例患者被随机分为接受雷尼替丁150毫克每日两次、奥美拉唑10毫克每日一次或奥美拉唑20毫克每日一次治疗,为期2周。无症状/轻度症状患者随访12个月。

方法

在短期和间歇治疗前及治疗期间完成心理总体幸福感指数和胃肠道症状评分量表。

结果

生活质量反应率>80%。尽管更多接受雷尼替丁治疗的患者需要4周治疗且增加剂量,但大多数接受20毫克每日一次奥美拉唑治疗的患者(55%)在2周后症状缓解。在初始治疗阶段,各治疗组间胃肠道症状评分量表的反流维度无差异,但10毫克每日一次奥美拉唑组的胃肠道症状评分量表总分改善显著优于雷尼替丁150毫克每日两次组(p = 0.006)。两种剂量的奥美拉唑改善心理总体幸福感总分均优于雷尼替丁(10毫克每日一次奥美拉唑与雷尼替丁150毫克每日两次相比,p = 0.005;20毫克每日一次奥美拉唑与雷尼替丁150毫克每日两次相比,p = 0.031)。在随访期间,复发患者恢复到治疗前的症状和幸福感评分,但这些维度在治疗后恢复。

结论

有反流症状的患者生活质量受损。无论患者内镜检查反流病阳性或阴性,按需治疗均可改善生活质量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验