• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在严重创伤情况下,多次剖腹手术是筋膜裂开的一个预测指标。

Multiple laparotomies are a predictor of fascial dehiscence in the setting of severe trauma.

作者信息

Swaroop Mamta, Williams Michael, Greene Wendy Ricketts, Sava Jack, Park Kenneth, Wang Dennis

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Section of Trauma, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2005 May;71(5):402-5.

PMID:15986970
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of wound dehiscence after repeat trauma laparotomy. We performed a retrospective analysis of adult trauma patients who underwent laparotomy at an urban level 1 trauma center during the past 5 years. Patients were divided into single (SL) and multiple laparotomy (ML) groups. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected. Data were analyzed using chi2, t testing, and ANOVA. Overall dehiscence rate was 0.7 per cent. Multiple laparotomy patients had damage control, staged management of their injuries, or abdominal compartment syndrome as the reason for reexploration. SL and ML patients had similar age and sex. ML patients had a higher rate of intra-abdominal abscess than SL patients (13.7% vs 1.2% P < 0.0001), but intra-abdominal abscess did not predict wound dehiscence in the ML group (P = 0.24). This was true in spite of the fact that ML patients had a significantly higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) than SL patients (21.68 vs 14.35, P < 0.0001). Interestingly, wound infection did not predict dehiscence. Patients undergoing repeat laparotomy after trauma are at increased risk for wound dehiscence. This risk appears to be associated with intraabdominal abscess and ISS, but not wound infection. Surgeons should leave the skin open in the setting of repeat trauma laparotomy, which will allow serial assessment of the integrity of the fascial closure.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定再次创伤剖腹术后伤口裂开的发生率。我们对过去5年在一家城市一级创伤中心接受剖腹手术的成年创伤患者进行了回顾性分析。患者被分为单次剖腹手术(SL)组和多次剖腹手术(ML)组。收集了人口统计学、临床和结局数据。使用卡方检验、t检验和方差分析对数据进行分析。总体裂开率为0.7%。多次剖腹手术患者因损伤控制、分期处理损伤或腹腔间隔室综合征而再次剖腹探查。SL组和ML组患者的年龄和性别相似。ML组患者腹腔内脓肿的发生率高于SL组(13.7%对1.2%,P<0.0001),但腹腔内脓肿并不能预测ML组的伤口裂开(P=0.24)。尽管ML组患者的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)明显高于SL组(21.68对14.35,P<0.0001),情况依然如此。有趣的是,伤口感染并不能预测裂开。创伤后接受再次剖腹手术的患者伤口裂开的风险增加。这种风险似乎与腹腔内脓肿和ISS有关,但与伤口感染无关。外科医生在再次创伤剖腹手术时应敞开皮肤,这将允许对筋膜缝合的完整性进行连续评估。

相似文献

1
Multiple laparotomies are a predictor of fascial dehiscence in the setting of severe trauma.在严重创伤情况下,多次剖腹手术是筋膜裂开的一个预测指标。
Am Surg. 2005 May;71(5):402-5.
2
The association of intra-abdominal infection and abdominal wound dehiscence.腹腔内感染与腹部伤口裂开的关联。
Am Surg. 1998 Jul;64(7):660-5.
3
Skin closure after trauma laparotomy in high-risk patients: opening opportunities for improvement.创伤性剖腹手术后的皮肤闭合:改善的机会。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Feb;74(2):433-9; discussion 439-40. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827e2589.
4
Smoking is a major risk factor for wound dehiscence after midline abdominal incision; case-control study.吸烟是腹部正中切口术后伤口裂开的主要危险因素;病例对照研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2009 Apr;79(4):247-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.04854.x.
5
[Damage control laparotomy in blunt abdominal injury].钝性腹部损伤的损伤控制剖腹术
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Aug;76(4):310-3.
6
[Penetrating abdominal trauma: 20 years experience in a Western European Trauma Center].[穿透性腹部创伤:西欧创伤中心20年经验]
Ann Ital Chir. 2008 Nov-Dec;79(6):399-407.
7
Perineal injuries at a large urban trauma center: injury patterns and outcomes.大型城市创伤中心的会阴损伤:损伤模式与结局
Am Surg. 2009 Apr;75(4):317-20.
8
Wound management after colon injury: open or closed? A prospective randomized trial.结肠损伤后的伤口处理:开放还是闭合?一项前瞻性随机试验。
Am Surg. 2002 Sep;68(9):795-801.
9
Primary repair of civilian colon injuries is safe in the damage control scenario.在损伤控制情况下,对平民结肠损伤进行一期修复是安全的。
Surgery. 2009 Oct;146(4):663-8; discussion 668-70. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.042.
10
Impact of obesity in damage control laparotomy patients.肥胖对损伤控制剖腹术患者的影响。
J Trauma. 2009 Jul;67(1):108-12; discussion 112-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a92ce0.

引用本文的文献

1
Are eviscerations preventable?脏器脱出能否预防?
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2025 Feb 21;52:e20253814. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20253814-en. eCollection 2025.
2
Six-year national study of damage control laparotomy and the effect of repeat re-exploration on rate of infectious complications.为期六年的损伤控制剖腹术及再次剖腹探查对感染并发症发生率影响的全国性研究。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021 Jun 15;6(1):e000706. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000706. eCollection 2021.
3
Interrupted sutures prevent recurrent abdominal fascial dehiscence: a comparative retrospective single center cohort analysis of risk factors of burst abdomen and its recurrence as well as surgical repair techniques.
间断缝合可预防腹部筋膜反复裂开:一项关于腹部切口裂开及其复发的危险因素以及手术修复技术的单中心队列比较回顾性分析
BMC Surg. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01219-x.
4
Effect of retension sutures on abdominal pressure after abdominal surgery.腹部手术后保留缝线对腹内压的影响。
Chin J Traumatol. 2018 Feb;21(1):20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.08.008. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
5
Simple and safe technique for closure of midline abdominal wound dehiscence.闭合腹部中线伤口裂开的简单安全技术。
Hernia. 2017 Oct;21(5):795-798. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1589-8. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
6
Evaluation of Risk Factors of Surgical Wound Dehiscence in Adults After Laparotomy.成人剖腹术后手术切口裂开危险因素的评估
Med Arch. 2016 Oct;70(5):369-372. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2016.70.369-372. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
7
Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model.成人腹部切口裂开:风险模型的建立与验证。
World J Surg. 2010 Jan;34(1):20-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0277-y.