Folbre Nancy, Yoon Jayoung, Finnoff Kade, Fuligni Allison Sidle
Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts, Thompson Hall, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Demography. 2005 May;42(2):373-90. doi: 10.1353/dem.2005.0013.
We argue that previous research on time devoted to child care has paid insufficient attention to the conceptualization of care time. Three separate problems are evident. First, the conventional focus on explicit activities with children distracts attention from the larger responsibilities of "passive" care, which ranges from time when children are sleeping to time when they are in the same general area but are not engaged in an activity with parents. Second, the empirical analysis of activity time focuses almost exclusively on parents, overlooking the role of relatives such as grandmothers and siblings. Third, the measurement of active care time often ignores the impact of overlaps among both care providers and recipients. Our analysis of the Child Development Supplement of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics sheds light on these three problems and presents new measures of passive and active care time.
我们认为,先前关于投入儿童照料时间的研究对照料时间的概念化关注不足。三个不同的问题显而易见。首先,传统上对与孩子进行的明确活动的关注,使人们的注意力从“被动”照料的更大责任上转移开了,这种责任范围从孩子睡觉时到他们在同一大致区域但未与父母进行活动的时间。其次,对活动时间的实证分析几乎完全集中在父母身上,忽视了祖母和兄弟姐妹等亲属的作用。第三,主动照料时间的衡量往往忽略了照料提供者和接受者之间重叠的影响。我们对收入动态面板研究的儿童发展补充部分的分析揭示了这三个问题,并提出了被动和主动照料时间的新衡量方法。