Squire Benjamin T, Fox John Christian, Anderson Craig
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jul;12(7):601-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.01.016.
Soft tissue infections are a common presenting complaint in the emergency department (ED). The authors sought to determine the utility of ED bedside ultrasonography (US) in detecting subcutaneous abscesses.
Between August 2003 and November 2004, a prospective, convenience sample of adult patients with a chief complaint suggestive of cellulitis and/or abscess was enrolled. US was performed by attending physicians or residents who had attended a 30-minute training session in soft tissue US. The treating physician recorded a yes/no assessment of whether he or she believed an abscess was present before and after the US examination. Incision and drainage (I + D) was the criterion standard when performed, while resolution on seven-day follow-up was the criterion standard when I + D was not performed.
Sixty-four of 107 patients had I + D-proven abscess, 17 of 107 had negative I + D, and 26 of 107 improved with antibiotic therapy alone. The sensitivity of clinical examination for abscesses was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 76% to 93%), and the specificity was 70% (95% CI = 55% to 82%). The positive predictive value was 81% (95% CI = 70% to 90%), and the negative predictive value was 77% (95% CI = 62% to 88%). The sensitivity of US for abscess was 98% (95% CI = 93% to 100%), and the specificity was 88% (95% CI = 76% to 96%). The positive predictive value was 93% (95% CI = 84% to 97%), and the negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI = 88% to 100%). Of 18 cases in which US disagreed with the clinical examination, US was correct in 17 (94% of cases with disagreement, chi(2) = 14.2, p = 0.0002).
ED bedside US improves accuracy in detection of superficial abscesses.
软组织感染是急诊科常见的就诊主诉。作者旨在确定急诊科床旁超声检查(US)在检测皮下脓肿方面的效用。
在2003年8月至2004年11月期间,纳入了以蜂窝织炎和/或脓肿为主要主诉的成年患者的前瞻性便利样本。超声检查由参加过30分钟软组织超声培训课程的主治医师或住院医师进行。治疗医师在超声检查前后记录其是否认为存在脓肿的是/否评估。进行切开引流(I + D)时,切开引流是标准对照;未进行切开引流时,七天随访时的病情缓解是标准对照。
107例患者中有64例经切开引流证实有脓肿,107例中有17例切开引流为阴性,107例中有26例仅通过抗生素治疗得到改善。临床检查对脓肿的敏感性为86%(95%置信区间[CI] = 76%至93%),特异性为70%(95% CI = 55%至82%)。阳性预测值为并81%(95% CI = 70%至90%),阴性预测值为77%(95% CI = 62%至88%)。超声检查对脓肿的敏感性为98%(95% CI = 93%至100%),特异性为88%(95% CI = 76%至96%)。阳性预测值为93%(95% CI = 84%至97%),阴性预测值为97%(95% CI = 88%至100%)。在超声检查结果与临床检查结果不一致于的18例病例中,超声检查正确的有17例(占不一致病例的94%,χ² = 14.2,p = 0.0002)。
急诊科床旁超声检查提高了浅表脓肿检测的准确性。