Suppr超能文献

脓肿:应用床边超声检查以方便评估浅表软组织感染。

ABSCESS: applied bedside sonography for convenient evaluation of superficial soft tissue infections.

作者信息

Squire Benjamin T, Fox John Christian, Anderson Craig

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jul;12(7):601-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.01.016.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Soft tissue infections are a common presenting complaint in the emergency department (ED). The authors sought to determine the utility of ED bedside ultrasonography (US) in detecting subcutaneous abscesses.

METHODS

Between August 2003 and November 2004, a prospective, convenience sample of adult patients with a chief complaint suggestive of cellulitis and/or abscess was enrolled. US was performed by attending physicians or residents who had attended a 30-minute training session in soft tissue US. The treating physician recorded a yes/no assessment of whether he or she believed an abscess was present before and after the US examination. Incision and drainage (I + D) was the criterion standard when performed, while resolution on seven-day follow-up was the criterion standard when I + D was not performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-four of 107 patients had I + D-proven abscess, 17 of 107 had negative I + D, and 26 of 107 improved with antibiotic therapy alone. The sensitivity of clinical examination for abscesses was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 76% to 93%), and the specificity was 70% (95% CI = 55% to 82%). The positive predictive value was 81% (95% CI = 70% to 90%), and the negative predictive value was 77% (95% CI = 62% to 88%). The sensitivity of US for abscess was 98% (95% CI = 93% to 100%), and the specificity was 88% (95% CI = 76% to 96%). The positive predictive value was 93% (95% CI = 84% to 97%), and the negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI = 88% to 100%). Of 18 cases in which US disagreed with the clinical examination, US was correct in 17 (94% of cases with disagreement, chi(2) = 14.2, p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

ED bedside US improves accuracy in detection of superficial abscesses.

摘要

目的

软组织感染是急诊科常见的就诊主诉。作者旨在确定急诊科床旁超声检查(US)在检测皮下脓肿方面的效用。

方法

在2003年8月至2004年11月期间,纳入了以蜂窝织炎和/或脓肿为主要主诉的成年患者的前瞻性便利样本。超声检查由参加过30分钟软组织超声培训课程的主治医师或住院医师进行。治疗医师在超声检查前后记录其是否认为存在脓肿的是/否评估。进行切开引流(I + D)时,切开引流是标准对照;未进行切开引流时,七天随访时的病情缓解是标准对照。

结果

107例患者中有64例经切开引流证实有脓肿,107例中有17例切开引流为阴性,107例中有26例仅通过抗生素治疗得到改善。临床检查对脓肿的敏感性为86%(95%置信区间[CI] = 76%至93%),特异性为70%(95% CI = 55%至82%)。阳性预测值为并81%(95% CI = 70%至90%),阴性预测值为77%(95% CI = 62%至88%)。超声检查对脓肿的敏感性为98%(95% CI = 93%至100%),特异性为88%(95% CI = 76%至96%)。阳性预测值为93%(95% CI = 84%至97%),阴性预测值为97%(95% CI = 88%至100%)。在超声检查结果与临床检查结果不一致于的18例病例中,超声检查正确的有17例(占不一致病例的94%,χ² = 14.2,p = 0.0002)。

结论

急诊科床旁超声检查提高了浅表脓肿检测的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验