Rahmani Erfan, Fayyazishishavan Ehsan, Afzalian Arian, Varshochi Sanaz, Amani-Beni Reza, Ahadiat Seyed-Amirabbas, Moshtaghi Zeynab, Shafagh Seyyed-Ghavam, Khorram Roya, Asadollahzade Elnaz, Atbaei Raihaneh, Kahrizi Mohammad Saeed, Rahbari Atoosa, Baharlouie Negar, Mostanbet Farzaneh, Amirabadiquchani Bahamin, Kiani Moein, Memarizadeh Mozhdeh, Keshtkar Rajabi Shahin, Barati Reza, Hajinouri Hengame, Najafi Shahrzad, Abdollahi Zeynab, Dadashzadehasl Nahid, Moghadam Fard Atousa, Afshar Mozhgan, Abedi Atefeh, Saeidi Sara, Mansourirad Adeleh, Emami Shahrezaei Pedram, Shah Hosseini Sepideh, Rostami Ghotbabadi Zahra, Vafadar Reza, Roohinezhad Roozbeh, Ghalamkarpour Nogol, Farrokhi Mehrdad
Graduated, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Jul 16;11(1):e49. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.2021. eCollection 2023.
Differentiating the soft tissue abscess from other types of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) poses a particular challenge because they have similar physical evaluation findings, but each disease has a different course, outcome, and treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosis of soft tissue abscess in the emergency departments.
A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar, from inception to January 2023, was conducted to identify relevant studies investigating the diagnostic performance of point-of-care ultrasonography for identification of abscess. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2).
The pooled estimates of diagnostic parameters of ultrasonography for diagnosis of abscess were as follows: sensitivity, 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92-0.94); specificity, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.85-0.89), and the area under the summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC), 0.95. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the SROC of studies in adult patients were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.92-1), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.95), and 0.99, respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the SROC of studies in pediatric patients were 0.9 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73-0.82), and 0.91, respectively.
Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the point-of-care ultrasonography has excellent diagnostic value for the abscess in the emergency department. Furthermore, we found that the diagnostic performance of point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosis of abscess was higher for adult cases than for pediatric patients.
区分软组织脓肿与其他类型的皮肤及软组织感染(SSTIs)是一项特殊挑战,因为它们在体格检查结果上相似,但每种疾病的病程、结局和治疗方法都不同。本荟萃分析旨在研究床旁超声检查在急诊科诊断软组织脓肿的诊断准确性。
对MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science、Embase和谷歌学术进行全面的文献检索,检索时间从数据库创建至2023年1月,以识别调查床旁超声检查对脓肿诊断性能的相关研究。使用修订后的诊断准确性研究质量评估工具(QUADAS-2)评估纳入研究的方法学质量。
超声检查诊断脓肿的诊断参数合并估计值如下:敏感性为0.93(95%置信区间:0.92-0.94);特异性为0.87(95%置信区间:0.85-0.89),汇总受试者工作特征曲线(SROC)下面积为0.95。成年患者研究的合并敏感性、特异性和SROC下面积分别为0.98(95%置信区间:0.92-1)、0.92(95%置信区间:0.86-0.95)和0.99。儿科患者研究的合并敏感性、特异性和SROC下面积分别为0.9(95%置信区间:0.87-0.92)、0.78(95%置信区间:0.73-0.82)和0.91。
我们的荟萃分析表明,床旁超声检查在急诊科对脓肿具有优异的诊断价值。此外,我们发现床旁超声检查对脓肿的诊断性能在成年病例中高于儿科患者。