Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center Emergency Department, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
J Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;60(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.07.028. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are a common complaint in the ambulatory setting and pose a significant burden on the health care system.
We sought to determine the accuracy of ultrasound for detecting soft tissue abscesses by emergency medicine associate providers (APs).
This was a prospective observational study of adult patients with suspected SSTI in the emergency department of a rural tertiary care academic medical center. The AP performed and interpreted point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) of the suspected infected area. Ultrasound images and interpretation were reviewed by the attending emergency physician with either rejection or agreement of the image interpretation, diagnosis, and management. If incision and drainage was performed, presence or absence of purulent drainage was recorded.
Sixty-four patients with suspected SSTI were enrolled: 29 had POCUS-proven abscesses and 33 had cellulitis; 2 were excluded. AP clinical evaluation alone for identifying abscess revealed sensitivity of 92.3 (74.9-99.1), specificity of 67.7 (49.5-82.6), positive predictive value of 68.6 (57.0-78.2), and negative predictive value of 92.0 (81.4-100). The use of POCUS by APs in addition to clinical examination demonstrated sensitivity of 96.2 (80.4-99.9), specificity of 93.9 (79.8-99.3), positive predictive value of 92.6 (76.5-98.0), and negative predictive value of 96.9 (81.9-99.5). p values were <0.05 for test characteristics. Ultrasound results changed SSTI management decisions in 10 of 62 (16.1%) patients, with the most common change being a new incision and drainage or needle aspiration. Agreement of the POCUS interpretation between APs and attending physicians was 96.8% with a κ of 0.94 (0.85-1.00).
With modest training, APs can successfully use POCUS to identify abscesses in patients in the emergency department with SSTIs. POCUS increases the ability to rule in the diagnosis and changes management in a clinically relevant number of patients with SSTIs.
皮肤和软组织感染(SSTIs)是门诊中常见的疾病,给医疗保健系统带来了巨大的负担。
我们旨在确定急诊医学助理医师(APs)使用超声检测软组织脓肿的准确性。
这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,纳入了在农村三级保健学术医疗中心急诊科就诊的疑似 SSTI 成年患者。AP 对疑似感染区域进行即时床旁超声(POCUS)检查和解释。由主治急诊医师对超声图像和解释进行复查,可拒绝或同意图像解释、诊断和管理。如果进行切开引流,记录有无脓性引流。
共纳入 64 例疑似 SSTI 患者:29 例 POCUS 证实为脓肿,33 例为蜂窝织炎;2 例被排除。AP 仅通过临床评估来识别脓肿,其敏感性为 92.3%(74.9-99.1),特异性为 67.7%(49.5-82.6),阳性预测值为 68.6%(57.0-78.2),阴性预测值为 92.0%(81.4-100)。AP 除临床检查外还使用 POCUS 检查,其敏感性为 96.2%(80.4-99.9),特异性为 93.9%(79.8-99.3),阳性预测值为 92.6%(76.5-98.0),阴性预测值为 96.9%(81.9-99.5)。p 值<0.05,提示检验特征有差异。超声结果改变了 62 例患者中的 10 例(16.1%)的 SSTI 治疗决策,最常见的改变是新的切开引流或针吸。AP 和主治医师对 POCUS 检查结果的一致性为 96.8%,κ 值为 0.94(0.85-1.00)。
经过适度培训,AP 能够成功使用 POCUS 来识别急诊科 SSTI 患者的脓肿。POCUS 增加了诊断的可能性,并在具有临床意义的 SSTI 患者中改变了治疗决策。