Kizer K W, Folkers L F, Felten P G, Neimeyer D
Health Promotion Section, California Department of Health Services, Sacramento.
Am J Prev Med. 1992 Mar-Apr;8(2):123-7.
The rapid expansion of worksite health promotion programs and the proliferation of service providers have resulted in increased concern about the quality of such programs. And while employers may view health promotion programs as a service to be purchased, in general, quality standards, price, and outcomes are less well established for primary prevention programs than for other medical services. This trend creates substantial potential for inappropriate expenditures, undermining the general credibility of such programs. Recognizing the limits of epidemiologic data and the potential for misuse of health promotion activities in the workplace, the California Department of Health Services (CDHS) undertook the development of guidelines for employers' use in assessing the quality of the numerous employee health promotion or chronic disease risk reduction programs available to them. To make the use of such programs as productive as possible, the CDHS developed recommendations in two main areas: (1) general recommendations for six fundamental program planning and development activities that underlie sound health promotion programs, and (2) specific criteria for seven types of health promotion programs commonly implemented in work settings. Optimally, worksite-based health promotion programs should be part of a comprehensive effort that provides for appropriate medical oversight, referral, and follow-up procedures. These programs should be complemented by appropriate changes in the work environment and in organizational policies. Programs should also include strategies to assist employees in initiating healthier behaviors and maintaining the new behaviors once they are established. Preventive medicine and occupational medicine practitioners and medical directors should be familiar with the issues addressed by these recommendations.
工作场所健康促进项目的迅速扩张以及服务提供商的激增,引发了人们对这类项目质量的更多关注。尽管雇主可能将健康促进项目视为一种可购买的服务,但总体而言,与其他医疗服务相比,初级预防项目的质量标准、价格和效果的界定尚不明确。这种趋势极有可能导致支出不当,损害此类项目的整体可信度。认识到流行病学数据的局限性以及工作场所健康促进活动可能被滥用的情况,加利福尼亚州卫生服务部(CDHS)着手制定指南,供雇主用于评估众多可供他们选择的员工健康促进或慢性病风险降低项目的质量。为了尽可能有效地利用此类项目,CDHS在两个主要领域提出了建议:(1)针对构成健全健康促进项目基础的六项基本项目规划和开展活动的一般性建议,以及(2)针对工作场所通常实施的七种健康促进项目类型的具体标准。理想情况下,基于工作场所的健康促进项目应成为一项综合工作的一部分,该综合工作应提供适当的医疗监督、转诊和后续程序。这些项目应辅以工作环境和组织政策的适当改变。项目还应包括一些策略,以帮助员工开始更健康的行为,并在新行为养成后维持这些行为。预防医学和职业医学从业者以及医疗主任应熟悉这些建议所涉及的问题。