Lucas C, van Gemert M J C, de Haan R J
Dept. Research and Innovation, University of Professional Education, Hogeschool van Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lasers Med Sci. 2003;18(2):72-7. doi: 10.1007/s10103-003-0259-5.
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been suggested as a promising treatment option for open wounds. In view of the absence of randomised studies with sufficiently large sample sizes, we assessed the efficacy of LLLT in the treatment of stage III decubitus ulcers. We performed a prospective, observer-blinded multicentre randomised clinical trial to assess the effect of LLLT as adjuvant to standard decubitus care. A total of 86 patients were enrolled into the study. Treatment was the prevailing consensus decubitus treatment (n=47); one group (n=39) had LLLT in addition, five times a week over a period of 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the absolute (mm2) and relative (%) wound size reduction at 6 weeks compared to baseline. Secondary outcome measures were the number of patients developing a stage IV ulcer during the study period, and the median change in Norton scores at 6 weeks compared to baseline. Based on the intention-to-treat principle, using last-observation-carried-forward analyses, Mann-Whitney U tests showed that the differences between the two groups in terms of absolute improvement (p=0.23) and relative improvement (p=0.42) were not significant. Because the wound size areas were non-normally distributed, we also analysed the data after logarithmic transformation of the wound size measurements. No significant difference in log(e) improvement scores between groups could be demonstrated (unpaired t-test: p=0.59). During the treatment period 11% of the patients in the control group and 8% of the patients in the LLLT group developed a stage IV decubitus ulcer (Fisher's exact test: p=0.72). The patients' Norton scores did not change during the treatment period. In this trial we found no evidence that justifies using low-level laser therapy as an adjuvant to the consensus decubitus ulcer treatment.
低强度激光疗法(LLLT)已被认为是开放性伤口一种有前景的治疗选择。鉴于缺乏足够大样本量的随机研究,我们评估了LLLT治疗III期压疮的疗效。我们进行了一项前瞻性、观察者盲法多中心随机临床试验,以评估LLLT作为标准压疮护理辅助手段的效果。共有86例患者纳入研究。治疗采用普遍认可的压疮治疗方法(n = 47);另一组(n = 39)在此基础上每周额外接受5次LLLT治疗,为期6周。主要结局指标是与基线相比,6周时伤口绝对面积(mm²)和相对面积(%)的缩小情况。次要结局指标是研究期间发展为IV期溃疡的患者数量,以及与基线相比,6周时诺顿评分的中位数变化。基于意向性分析原则,采用末次观察结转分析,曼-惠特尼U检验显示两组在绝对改善(p = 0.23)和相对改善(p = 0.42)方面的差异不显著。由于伤口面积数据呈非正态分布,我们还对伤口大小测量值进行对数转换后分析数据。两组间对数(e)改善评分无显著差异(独立样本t检验:p = 0.59)。治疗期间,对照组11%的患者和LLLT组8%的患者发展为IV期压疮(Fisher精确检验:p = 0.72)。治疗期间患者的诺顿评分未发生变化。在本试验中,我们没有发现证据支持将低强度激光疗法作为公认的压疮溃疡治疗的辅助手段。