Suppr超能文献

关于不孕症的互联网专家论坛的信息需求与访客体验。

Information needs and visitors' experience of an Internet expert forum on infertility.

作者信息

Himmel Wolfgang, Meyer Juliane, Kochen Michael M, Michelmann Hans Wilhelm

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2005 Jun 30;7(2):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.2.e20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients increasingly use health portals and Web-based expert forums (ask-the-doctor services), but little is known about the specific needs of Internet users visiting such websites, the nature of their requests, or how satisfied they are with Internet health experts.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the information requests of (mostly female) patients visiting an Internet expert forum on involuntary childlessness and their satisfaction with the experts' feedback.

METHODS

We posted an electronic questionnaire on a website hosting an expert forum on involuntary childlessness. The questionnaire was "activated" whenever a visitor sent a question or request to the expert forum. The survey focused on the reasons for visiting the expert forum and whether the visitors were satisfied with the experts' answers to previously posted questions. The free-text questions of visitors who answered the survey were analyzed using Atlas-ti, a software program for qualitative data analysis.

RESULTS

Over a period of 6 months, 513 out of 610 visitors (84%) answered the questionnaire. The majority of respondents (65.5%) expected general information about involuntary childlessness, conception, or an evaluation of drugs. Others were concerned about their actual treatment (40.6%) and therapeutic options (28.8%). Out of 225 respondents who had previously contacted the forum, 223 has received an answer, and 123 (55.2%) were satisfied with the experts' answers. About half (105/223) of those users who had previously received an answer from the expert forum stated that they had discussed it with their own doctor. More of these users were satisfied with their subsequent care in fertility clinics than users who did not talk to their doctor about their Internet activities (93.9% vs 76.1%; P = .015). According to the qualitative analysis, many requests (n = 194) were more or less trivial, especially those for information on basic aspects of reproduction. More than one-third of visitors (n = 199) sent detailed results of diagnostic tests and asked for a first or second opinion. Requests to the expert forum were also sent in order to obtain emotional support (17%) or to complain about a doctor (15%).

CONCLUSIONS

Visitors who sent their laboratory findings to receive a thorough evaluation or a second opinion had a good command of the opportunities that an expert forum offers. One important expectation of the forum was emotional support, indicating psychological needs that were not met by medical providers. Future websites must find a compromise in order to protect experts from being overwhelmed by general, nonspecific requests while supporting patients with individualized answers.

摘要

背景

患者越来越多地使用健康门户网站和基于网络的专家论坛(在线问诊服务),但对于访问此类网站的互联网用户的具体需求、他们请求的性质,或者他们对网络健康专家的满意度了解甚少。

目的

本研究的目的是分析访问一个关于非自愿性不孕的互联网专家论坛的(大多数为女性)患者的信息请求,以及她们对专家反馈的满意度。

方法

我们在一个托管非自愿性不孕专家论坛的网站上发布了一份电子问卷。每当有访客向专家论坛发送问题或请求时,问卷即“启动”。该调查聚焦于访问专家论坛的原因,以及访客对专家对先前发布问题的回答是否满意。使用Atlas-ti(一种定性数据分析软件程序)对回答调查的访客的自由文本问题进行分析。

结果

在6个月的时间里,610名访客中有513名(84%)回答了问卷。大多数受访者(65.5%)期望获得关于非自愿性不孕、受孕或药物评估的一般信息。其他人则关注他们的实际治疗(40.6%)和治疗选择(28.8%)。在225名先前联系过该论坛的受访者中,223人收到了回复,123人(55.2%)对专家的回答感到满意。在那些先前从专家论坛收到回复的用户中,约一半(105/223)表示他们已与自己的医生讨论过。与未就其网络活动与医生交谈的用户相比,这些用户对随后在生育诊所接受的护理更满意(93.9%对76.1%;P = 0.015)。根据定性分析,许多请求(n = 194)或多或少都很琐碎,尤其是那些关于生殖基本方面信息的请求。超过三分之一的访客(n = 199)发送了诊断测试的详细结果并寻求一审或二审意见。向专家论坛发送请求也是为了获得情感支持(17%)或投诉医生(15%)。

结论

那些发送实验室检查结果以获得全面评估或二审意见的访客很好地利用了专家论坛提供的机会。该论坛的一个重要期望是获得情感支持,这表明医疗服务提供者未能满足的心理需求。未来的网站必须找到一种折衷办法,以保护专家不被一般性、非特定性请求淹没,同时用个性化答案支持患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验