Klopper Hester, Andersson Helena, Minkkinen Maria, Ohlsson Cecilia, Sjöström Björn
Department of Nursing Education, North-West University, South Africa.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2006 Feb;22(1):12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2005.05.001. Epub 2005 Jul 6.
The purpose of this validation study was to describe strategies used in postoperative pain assessment among a group of nurses in South Africa. A mixed qualitative and quantitative study was conducted in a 950-bed academic hospital complex. Surgical nurses (n = 12) carried out pain assessments of postoperative patients (n = 36) in pain. Data were collected using detailed interviews and pain intensity was estimated on a visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-10 cm). Nurses used four categories of criteria (a) how the patient looks, (b) what the patient says, (c) the patient's way of talking, and (d) experience of similar circumstances and drew on their past experiences in five different ways: (a) some patients report lower pain intensity than expected, (b) a typology of patients, (c) a focus on listening to patients, (d) what to look for, and (e) what to do for patients were identified. The system of categories described by Sjöström [Sjöström B. Assessing acute postoperative pain. Assessment strategies and quality of clinical experience and professional role. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis; 1995] was valid for this sample with an additional category. The different categories seem to be complementary and necessary for assessing pain in others. The findings have implications for professionals who provide care for patients in pain.
这项验证性研究的目的是描述南非一组护士在术后疼痛评估中使用的策略。在一家拥有950张床位的学术医院综合体内进行了一项定性与定量相结合的研究。外科护士(n = 12)对36名疼痛的术后患者进行了疼痛评估。通过详细访谈收集数据,并使用视觉模拟量表(VAS,0 - 10厘米)评估疼痛强度。护士们使用了四类标准:(a)患者的外观,(b)患者的言语,(c)患者的说话方式,以及(d)类似情况的经验,并以五种不同方式借鉴他们过去的经验:(a)一些患者报告的疼痛强度低于预期,(b)患者类型,(c)专注于倾听患者,(d)寻找什么,以及(e)为患者做什么。Sjöström [Sjöström B. 评估急性术后疼痛。评估策略以及临床经验和专业角色的质量。哥德堡:哥德堡大学学报;1995年]所描述的类别系统对这个样本有效,但增加了一个类别。不同的类别似乎是互补的,对于评估他人的疼痛是必要的。这些发现对为疼痛患者提供护理的专业人员具有启示意义。