Suppr超能文献

自我牺牲的伦理:自杀式爆炸袭击错在哪里?

The ethics of self-sacrifice: what's wrong with suicide bombing?

作者信息

Battin Margaret P

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112, USA.

出版信息

Arch Suicide Res. 2004;8(1):29-36. doi: 10.1080/13811110490243750.

Abstract

What's wrong with suicide bombing? The tactic has been used by the Tamil Tigers, by the Japanese kamikaze, by al-Qaeda, by Palestinian militants against Israel, by Iraqi defenders loyal to Saddam Hussein against the U.S. invasion, and by others; it is typically understood by these groups as martyrdom rather than suicide. Scientific theories of suicide--biological, psychological, and sociological--do not contribute to an understanding. Nor is the claim that it is amoral, the product of psychopathology or mental illness, adequate. The central moral core of the issue of suicide bombing rests, rather, on the violation of a tacit assumption of equality in combat: "they" have a weapon "we" don't.

摘要

自杀式爆炸袭击有什么问题?泰米尔猛虎组织、日本神风特攻队、基地组织、巴勒斯坦激进分子针对以色列、忠于萨达姆·侯赛因的伊拉克防御者对抗美国入侵等都曾使用过这种策略;这些组织通常将其视为殉道而非自杀。关于自杀的科学理论——生物学、心理学和社会学的——无助于理解这一现象。声称其不道德、是精神病理学或精神疾病的产物,这种说法也不充分。相反,自杀式爆炸袭击问题的核心道德在于违背了战斗中平等的默认假设:“他们”有一种“我们”没有的武器。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验