• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知觉加工需求对惊跳眨眼修正的影响。

Effects of perceptual processing demands on startle eyeblink modification.

作者信息

Rissling Anthony J, Dawson Michael E, Schell Anne M, Nuechterlein Keith H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-1061, USA.

出版信息

Psychophysiology. 2005 Jul;42(4):440-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00296.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00296.x
PMID:16008772
Abstract

Startle eyeblink modification was measured during a continuous performance test (CPT) with either clearly focused stimuli or visually degraded stimuli to measure the effects of early perceptual processing demands on startle modification. A startling noise was presented either 120, 240, or 1200 ms following target and nontarget CPT stimuli. In the degraded stimulus CPT, startle inhibition at 240 ms was greater following targets than nontargets and was as great during targets at 240 ms as at 120 ms, whereas in the clearly focused CPT, inhibition declined significantly from 120 to 240 ms. The results indicate that maximum prepulse inhibition is extended in time when the task involves discrimination of degraded visual stimuli and when early perceptual processing demands are high. At 1200 ms, targets and nontargets produced nondifferential inhibition during both CPTs, suggesting that modality-specific attention occurred equally for the two tasks.

摘要

在持续操作测试(CPT)期间,通过清晰聚焦刺激或视觉退化刺激来测量惊吓眨眼修正,以评估早期感知处理需求对惊吓修正的影响。在目标和非目标CPT刺激之后120、240或1200毫秒呈现一声惊吓噪声。在退化刺激CPT中,目标出现后240毫秒时的惊吓抑制比非目标出现后更大,且目标出现后240毫秒时的惊吓抑制与120毫秒时一样大,而在清晰聚焦CPT中,抑制从120毫秒到240毫秒显著下降。结果表明,当任务涉及辨别退化视觉刺激且早期感知处理需求较高时,最大前脉冲抑制在时间上会延长。在1200毫秒时,两种CPT中目标和非目标产生的抑制无差异,表明两种任务的模态特异性注意力均等。

相似文献

1
Effects of perceptual processing demands on startle eyeblink modification.知觉加工需求对惊跳眨眼修正的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2005 Jul;42(4):440-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00296.x.
2
Effects of cigarette smoking on prepulse inhibition, its attentional modulation, and vigilance performance.吸烟对前脉冲抑制、其注意力调节及警觉表现的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2007 Jul;44(4):627-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00528.x. Epub 2007 May 22.
3
Attentional stages of information processing during a continuous performance test: a startle modification analysis.持续性操作测试中信息处理的注意阶段:惊吓修正分析
Psychophysiology. 2001 Jul;38(4):669-77.
4
Effects of perceptual load on startle reflex modification at a long lead interval.知觉负荷对长超前间隔下惊吓反射调节的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2006 Sep;43(5):498-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00420.x.
5
Probing attentional dysfunctions in schizophrenia: Startle modification during a continuous performance test.探究精神分裂症中的注意力功能障碍:持续操作测试期间的惊跳反应改变
Psychophysiology. 2008 Jul;45(4):632-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00653.x. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
6
Modality-specific attentional startle modulation during continuous performance tasks: a brief time is sufficient.持续执行任务期间特定模态的注意惊跳调制:短时间就足够了。
Psychophysiology. 2008 Nov;45(6):1068-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00705.x. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
7
Automatic and controlled attentional processes in startle eyeblink modification: effects of habituation of the prepulse.惊吓眨眼修正中的自动和受控注意过程:预脉冲习惯化的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2000 Jul;37(4):409-17.
8
Processing of own versus other names differentially affects startle reflex modification.对自身名字与他人名字的处理会以不同方式影响惊吓反射的改变。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Nov;62(2):233-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 May 5.
9
The effect of emotional and attentional load on attentional startle modulation.情绪和注意力负荷对注意惊跳调制的影响。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Dec;74(3):266-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.09.011. Epub 2009 Oct 4.
10
The effect of warning stimulus modality on blink startle modification in reaction time tasks.警告刺激方式对反应时任务中眨眼惊吓修正的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2000 Jan;37(1):55-64.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Stimulus-Driven and Goal-Directed Attention on Prepulse Inhibition of Brain Oscillations.刺激驱动型和目标导向型注意力对脑振荡前脉冲抑制的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jul 29;10:390. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00390. eCollection 2016.
2
Lack of relationship between acoustic startle and cognitive variables in schizophrenia and control subjects.精神分裂症患者和对照组人群的听觉惊跳反应与认知变量之间缺乏关系。
Psychiatry Res. 2011 May 30;187(3):324-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.02.011. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
3
Has an important test been overlooked? Closure flexibility in schizophrenia.
是否有重要的测试被忽视了?精神分裂症的闭合灵活性。
Schizophr Res. 2010 May;118(1-3):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.01.005. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
4
Differences in startle reflex and prepulse inhibition in European-Americans and African-Americans.欧裔美国人和非裔美国人在惊跳反射和前脉冲抑制方面的差异。
Psychophysiology. 2008 Sep;45(5):876-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00680.x. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
5
The effects of nicotine on the attentional modification of the acoustic startle response in nonsmokers.尼古丁对非吸烟者听觉惊跳反应的注意力调节作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008 May;198(1):93-101. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1094-y. Epub 2008 Mar 13.