Parsons S, Barker P J, Armstrong A E
Department of Psychiatry, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, The Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK.
Nurs Ethics. 2001 Jan;8(1):45-56. doi: 10.1177/096973300100800106.
Senior lecturers/lecturers in mental health nursing (11 in round one, nine in round two, and eight in the final round) participated in a three-round Delphi study into the teaching of health care ethics (HCE) to students of nursing. The participants were drawn from six (round one) and four (round three) UK universities. Information was gathered on the organization, methods used and content of HCE modules. Questionnaire responses were transcribed and the content analysed for patterns of interest and areas of convergence or divergence. Findings include: the majority (72.8%) of the sample believed that insufficient time was allocated to the teaching of HCE; case studies were considered a popular, although problematic, teaching method; the 'four principles' approach was less than dominant in the teaching of HCE; and virtue ethics was taught by only 36.4% of the participants. The Delphi technique proved adequate and worth while for the purposes of this study. Further empirical research could aim to replicate or contradict these findings, using a larger sample and recruiting more university departments. Reflection is required on several issues, including the depth and breadth to which ethics theory and, more controversially, meta-ethics, are taught to nursing students.
精神健康护理专业的高级讲师/讲师(第一轮11人,第二轮9人,最后一轮8人)参与了一项三轮德尔菲研究,该研究围绕向护理专业学生传授医疗保健伦理(HCE)展开。参与者来自英国的六所大学(第一轮)和四所大学(第三轮)。收集了有关HCE模块的组织、使用方法和内容的信息。问卷回复被转录,并对内容进行分析,以找出感兴趣的模式以及趋同或分歧的领域。研究结果包括:样本中的大多数(72.8%)认为分配给HCE教学的时间不足;案例研究被认为是一种受欢迎但有问题的教学方法;“四原则”方法在HCE教学中并不占主导地位;只有36.4%的参与者讲授美德伦理学。德尔菲技术被证明适用于本研究目的且很有价值。进一步的实证研究可以旨在使用更大的样本并招募更多的大学部门来复制或反驳这些发现。需要对几个问题进行反思,包括向护理专业学生传授伦理理论以及更具争议性的元伦理学的深度和广度。