Kiat-amnuay Sudarat, Johnston Dennis A, Powers John M, Jacob Rhonda F
Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials, The University of Texas Dental Branch at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
J Prosthodont. 2005 Jun;14(2):91-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00017.x.
The purpose of this study was to measure spectrophotometrically the color stability of pigmented A-2186 silicone maxillofacial elastomer with 10% by volume of titanium white dry earth opacifier before and after exposure to microwave energy over a simulated 1.5-year period of microwave sterilization.
A-2186 silicone elastomer opacified with titanium white dry earth pigment, pigmented with 5 cosmetic dry earth pigment colors [no pigment (control) group (Pc), red (Pr), yellow ochre (Py), burnt sienna (Po), and a mixture of Pr + Py + Po color group (P3)], was used in this study. Each of the 5 experimental groups consisted of 5 specimens. All specimens were placed in a 250 ml glass beaker filled with 150 ml of water (replenished for each microwave exposure). An exposure of 6 minutes was used 18 times (simulating 1.5 years of microwave sterilization with one 6 minute exposure monthly). Reflectance values were measured by spectrophotometer. Three- and two-way analyses of variance with repeated measures were performed for the color difference (DeltaE*) with the factors of group/color/months, and group/months, respectively. Means were compared by Tukey Honest Significant Difference (HSD) multiple range test calculated at the 0.05 level of significance using SPSS.
The trained human eye can detect color changes (DeltaE*) greater than 1.0. Most DeltaE* values of the red pigment group at all intervals and the mixed pigment group at 15- and 18- month intervals increased significantly greater than 1.0 (p < 0.001) compared with the control group. Yellow and burnt sienna groups remained the most color stable over time with DeltaE* values below 0.35.
Lack of color stability of red dry earth pigmented A-2186 silicone maxillofacial elastomers was clinically significant after 12-month exposure to microwave energy as compared with yellow, burnt sienna, and opacified A-2186 dry earth pigments.
本研究旨在通过分光光度法测量添加了体积分数为10%钛白干土遮光剂的A - 2186着色素硅橡胶颌面弹性体在模拟1.5年微波灭菌周期的微波能量暴露前后的颜色稳定性。
本研究使用了添加钛白干土颜料遮光的A - 2186硅橡胶弹性体,并用5种化妆品用干土颜料颜色进行着色[无颜料(对照组)(Pc)、红色(Pr)、赭黄色(Py)、深褐(Po)以及Pr + Py + Po颜色组合组(P3)]。5个实验组每组由5个样本组成。所有样本均置于一个装有150 ml水的250 ml玻璃烧杯中(每次微波暴露后补充水)。每次暴露6分钟,共进行18次(模拟每月一次6分钟暴露,持续1.5年的微波灭菌)。通过分光光度计测量反射率值。分别对组/颜色/月份以及组/月份因素下的色差(ΔE*)进行重复测量的三因素和两因素方差分析。使用SPSS在0.05显著性水平下通过Tukey真实显著差异(HSD)多重范围检验比较均值。
经过训练的人眼能够检测到大于1.0的颜色变化(ΔE*)。与对照组相比,红色颜料组在所有时间间隔以及混合颜料组在15个月和18个月时间间隔时的大多数ΔE值显著增加,大于1.0(p < 0.001)。随着时间推移,黄色和深褐组的颜色稳定性最高,ΔE值低于0.35。
与黄色、深褐以及添加遮光剂的A - 2186干土颜料相比,红色干土颜料着色的A - 2186硅橡胶颌面弹性体在暴露于微波能量12个月后颜色稳定性不足具有临床意义。