Fortune Dónal G, Varden Jacqui, Parker Sophie, Harper Lindsay, Richards Helen L, Shaffer Jon L
Department of Behavioural Medicine, Hope Hospital, Salford, and Academic Division of Clinical Psychology, University of Manchester, UK.
Clin Nutr. 2005 Dec;24(6):896-903. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.05.015. Epub 2005 Jul 11.
Intestinal failure (IF) is likely to be the source of significant emotional distress for patients; however, little is known about the system of beliefs held by patients on home parenteral nutrition (HPN) that may underpin such distress. The present study aimed to: (1) examine the 'common-sense' representation of IF in patients on HPN; (2) investigate whether there were any differences in such representations with regard to primary diagnosis, clinical history or aspects of treatment; and (3) test the relative importance of psychological, disease and treatment factors in accounting for IF-specific emotional outcome (feelings of anger, upset, anxiety, low mood, and fear).
Sixty-one patients with IF on HPN completed an assessment of their beliefs about causes of their condition, consequences, symptoms experienced, personal and treatment control, chronicity and recurrence, and emotional representations (feelings of anger, upset, anxiety, low mood, and fear). Standard clinical information was also gathered from patients.
Neither primary diagnosis, age, duration since start of HPN, number of nights on HPN, gender, presence of a stoma, or age at onset of HPN showed any significant differential effect on emotional representations. The principal predictors of emotional representations were: (1) poorer appraisals of patients' ability to exert personal control over aspects of their condition and treatment; and (2) the perception that the condition and treatment makes little sense to the patient (illness coherence).
The current study demonstrates that the illness and their treatments per se are insufficient to account for patients' emotional distress. Rather, cognitive variables, chiefly beliefs about personal control and illness coherence account for more of the variance in emotional outcome than any other clinical or health-related variable assessed in the current study.
肠衰竭(IF)很可能是患者产生严重情绪困扰的根源;然而,对于患者关于家庭肠内营养(HPN)的信念体系了解甚少,而这一信念体系可能是此类困扰的基础。本研究旨在:(1)探究接受HPN治疗的患者对IF的“常识性”认知;(2)调查在原发性诊断、临床病史或治疗方面,这些认知是否存在差异;(3)检验心理、疾病和治疗因素在解释IF特定情绪结果(愤怒、心烦、焦虑、情绪低落和恐惧情绪)方面的相对重要性。
61例接受HPN治疗的IF患者完成了一项评估,内容包括他们对自身病情病因、后果、经历的症状、个人及治疗控制、慢性病程和复发情况以及情绪认知(愤怒、心烦、焦虑、情绪低落和恐惧情绪)的信念。还从患者处收集了标准临床信息。
原发性诊断、年龄、开始HPN治疗后的时长、接受HPN治疗的夜晚数、性别、造口的存在与否或开始HPN治疗时的年龄,均未对情绪认知产生任何显著的差异影响。情绪认知的主要预测因素为:(1)患者对自身病情和治疗方面进行个人控制能力的较差评估;(2)认为病情和治疗对患者而言毫无意义(疾病连贯性)。
当前研究表明,疾病及其治疗本身不足以解释患者的情绪困扰。相反,认知变量,主要是关于个人控制和疾病连贯性的信念,比本研究中评估的任何其他临床或健康相关变量,能解释更多情绪结果的差异。