Gomaa Wafaey, Ke Youqiang, Fujii Hiroshi, Helliwell Timothy
Department of Pathology, University of Liverpool, Duncan Building, Daulby Street, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK.
Virchows Arch. 2005 Oct;447(4):701-9. doi: 10.1007/s00428-005-0002-7. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
Tissue microarrays allow the simultaneous analysis of many tumours using small-diameter cores sampled from larger blocks of tissue, but may be limited by tumour heterogeneity. This study considers the validation of tissue microarray for the study of four molecules of interest as prognostic factors in head and neck squamous carcinoma, including a consideration of methods for assessing immunocytochemical scoring of microarrays. Tissue microarray blocks were constructed from 100 cases of head and neck squamous carcinoma, taking four cores from different areas of each tumour. Immunocytochemical labelling was performed for cutaneous fatty acid binding protein, involucrin, vascular endothelial growth factor and Ki-67. The extent and intensity of scoring was determined for each core and the degree of agreement determined for results from the assessment of two, three or four cores for each carcinoma. In a subset of 30 representative cases, the labelling in the tissue microarrays was compared with that in whole-tissue sections of the same carcinomas. An adequate sample of carcinoma was achieved in more than 90% of the 400 cores; unsuccessful results were attributed to uneven core alignment or to poor targeting of the tumour tissue in the donor blocks. The degree of agreement in the assessment of extent and intensity of labelling was moderate to good (weighted kappa, range 0.479-0.902) between whole-tissue sections and microarray sections depending on the antigen and the scoring system. Tissue microarray is a reliable tool to demonstrate cellular and molecular alterations in head and neck squamous carcinomas. We recommend using the mean results from four cores for biological studies, with analysis of categorical data based on quartile groups. Concordance with whole-tissue section data is reassuring, but data from microarrays need to be validated against clinical outcomes.
组织微阵列允许使用从较大组织块中采样的小直径芯同时分析多个肿瘤,但可能受肿瘤异质性的限制。本研究考虑验证组织微阵列用于研究头颈部鳞状细胞癌中四种感兴趣分子作为预后因素,包括评估微阵列免疫细胞化学评分的方法。组织微阵列块由100例头颈部鳞状细胞癌构建而成,从每个肿瘤的不同区域取四个芯。对皮肤脂肪酸结合蛋白、外皮蛋白、血管内皮生长因子和Ki-67进行免疫细胞化学标记。确定每个芯的评分范围和强度,并确定每个癌两个、三个或四个芯评估结果的一致程度。在30例代表性病例的子集中,将组织微阵列中的标记与相同癌的全组织切片中的标记进行比较。400个芯中超过90%获得了足够的癌样本;未成功的结果归因于芯排列不均匀或供体块中肿瘤组织靶向不佳。根据抗原和评分系统,全组织切片和微阵列切片之间标记范围和强度评估的一致程度为中度至良好(加权kappa,范围0.479 - 0.902)。组织微阵列是展示头颈部鳞状细胞癌细胞和分子改变的可靠工具。我们建议在生物学研究中使用四个芯的平均结果,并基于四分位数组分析分类数据。与全组织切片数据的一致性令人放心,但微阵列数据需要根据临床结果进行验证。