Suppr超能文献

用于法医评估的审前拘押是否被用于控制滋扰行为?

Are pretrial commitments for forensic evaluation used to control nuisance behavior?

作者信息

Appelbaum K L, Fisher W H, Nestelbaum Z, Batemen A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester 01655.

出版信息

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992 Jun;43(6):603-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.43.6.603.

Abstract

The shift to dangerousness-oriented civil commitment criteria has led to speculation that mentally ill persons who do not meet those criteria are being hospitalized under criminal commitment statutes. Using data on patients' psychiatric symptoms at admission to a state hospital in Massachusetts, the authors retrospectively assessed whether patients charged with minor criminal offenses who were committed for evaluation of competence to stand trial would have met civil commitment criteria. The data suggest that most mentally ill patients who were criminally committed could have been civilly committed. However, a relatively greater proportion of persons with substance abuse, mental retardation, or other conditions who did not meet civil commitment criteria for mental illness were committed for pretrial evaluation.

摘要

向以危险性为导向的民事强制入院标准的转变引发了一种猜测,即未符合这些标准的精神疾病患者正依据刑事强制入院法规被收治入院。作者利用马萨诸塞州一家州立医院患者入院时的精神症状数据,回顾性评估了因受轻罪指控而被强制入院以评估受审能力的患者是否会符合民事强制入院标准。数据表明,大多数被刑事强制入院的精神疾病患者本可被民事强制入院。然而,相对更大比例的存在药物滥用、智力障碍或其他不符合精神疾病民事强制入院标准情况的人被强制进行审前评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验