• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于民事强制住院的精神疾病记录。

On the recording of mental illness for civil commitment.

作者信息

McCready J, Merskey H

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 1982 Mar;27(2):140-3. doi: 10.1177/070674378202700209.

DOI:10.1177/070674378202700209
PMID:7066845
Abstract

The survey of 102 consecutive certificates for involuntary admission and a review of the case material demonstrated that in 78 cases the form was completed adequately. In 13 cases full description of evidence of mental disorder was lacking on the certificate but after reviewing the cases it would appear that clear evidence of mental disorder was probably present at the time of certification. In this survey, suicidal or homicidal risk alone was not considered evidence of mental disorder. In the full 11 cases the grounds for diagnosing mental disorder rested upon the presence of phenomena like anger, alcoholism, or mild mental retardation or the presence of a personality disorder, all of these being associated with risk to the patient or another person. Compelling evidence for the necessity of psychiatric commitment in these complex situations cannot be described briefly; thus it does not appear that an altered certification form would solve the problem.

摘要

对102份连续的非自愿入院证明进行的调查以及对病例材料的审查表明,在78例中,表格填写完整。在13例中,证明上缺乏对精神障碍证据的完整描述,但在审查这些病例后,似乎在开具证明时可能存在明确的精神障碍证据。在本次调查中,仅自杀或杀人风险不被视为精神障碍的证据。在全部11例中,诊断精神障碍的依据是存在愤怒、酗酒、轻度智力迟钝或人格障碍等现象,所有这些都与对患者或他人的风险相关。在这些复杂情况下,无法简要描述强制进行精神科住院治疗必要性的有力证据;因此,似乎修改后的证明表格并不能解决问题。

相似文献

1
On the recording of mental illness for civil commitment.关于民事强制住院的精神疾病记录。
Can J Psychiatry. 1982 Mar;27(2):140-3. doi: 10.1177/070674378202700209.
2
Are pretrial commitments for forensic evaluation used to control nuisance behavior?用于法医评估的审前拘押是否被用于控制滋扰行为?
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992 Jun;43(6):603-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.43.6.603.
3
The legal basis of forensic psychiatry: statutorily mandated psychiatric diagnoses.
Am J Psychiatry. 1987 Jul;144(7):847-53. doi: 10.1176/ajp.144.7.847.
4
The dangerousness criterion for civil commitment: the problem and a possible solution.
Can J Psychiatry. 1991 May;36(4):285-9. doi: 10.1177/070674379103600409.
5
Civil commitment practices in 1977: troubled semantics and/or troubled psychiatry.
Can Psychiatr Assoc J. 1979 Jun;24(4):329-35. doi: 10.1177/070674377902400409.
6
The context of involuntary commitment on the basis of danger to others: a study of the use of the California 14-day certificate.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1982 Oct;170(10):622-7. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198210000-00006.
7
Compliance by physicians with the 1978 Ontario Mental Health Act.医生对1978年《安大略省精神健康法》的遵守情况。
Can Med Assoc J. 1981 Mar 15;124(6):719-24.
8
An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders.与精神错乱罪犯相关的法律介绍。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2004;14 Suppl 1:S12-8. doi: 10.1002/cbm.603.
9
In defense of the insanity defense.
Hillside J Clin Psychiatry. 1983;5(1):73-90.
10
New directions in the assessment of dangerousness of the mentally ill.评估精神病患者危险性的新方向。
Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol. 1994;48 Suppl:77-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1994.tb03042.x.