• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[在精神科刑事收押情况下的危险性预后]

[Dangerousness prognosis in the clinical context of fulfillment of psychiatric criminal commitment].

作者信息

Weber F, Koch U, Leygraf N

机构信息

Institut für forensische Psychiatrie, Gesamthochschule Essen.

出版信息

Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1996 Aug;46(8):312-7.

PMID:8927687
Abstract

The compilation and the reliability-based evaluation of the questionnaire including potentially prognosis-relevant clinical criteria for the release of male patients from rehabilitation and security measure (section 63 German Criminal Code) are presented. The restriction to clinical (rather than social statistical) criteria results in a concentration of the criminal aspects of treatment and/or therapy. The open and, more importantly, the "unconscious" focuses of forensic clinical action become transparent. However, the prognostic constructs of clinicians prove to be somewhat lacking in criteria and rather inconsistent. Until it is validated as a prognostic instrument and integrated in a multidimensional inventory of prognoses, this questionnaire can contribute towards conceptual transparency and help create a better link between treatment and release criteria.

摘要

本文介绍了一份问卷的编制及其基于可靠性的评估,该问卷包含了与男性患者从康复和安全措施(德国刑法典第63条)中释放相关的潜在预后临床标准。将标准限制在临床(而非社会统计)标准上,使得治疗和/或疗法的刑事方面得以集中体现。法医临床行动中公开的、更重要的是“无意识”的重点变得清晰明了。然而,临床医生的预后构想在标准方面略显不足且相当不一致。在该问卷被验证为一种预后工具并纳入多维预后清单之前,它有助于提高概念的透明度,并有助于在治疗和释放标准之间建立更好的联系。

相似文献

1
[Dangerousness prognosis in the clinical context of fulfillment of psychiatric criminal commitment].[在精神科刑事收押情况下的危险性预后]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1996 Aug;46(8):312-7.
2
Personality disorders and 'restoration to sanity'.人格障碍与“恢复理智”。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1994;22(2):257-67.
3
[Multidimensional personality assessment in penal measures. An evaluation questionnaire as the deciding factor of dangerousness prognosis].[刑罚措施中的多维人格评估。作为危险性预后决定因素的一份评估问卷]
Psychiatr Prax. 1993 Jan;20(1):9-14.
4
Prediction of dangerousness in mentally disordered offenders in Germany.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2002 Jan-Feb;25(1):51-66. doi: 10.1016/s0160-2527(01)00096-6.
5
[The reliability of expert assessment: comparative study of hospitalized or imprisoned patients following criminal behavior].[专家评估的可靠性:对犯罪行为后住院或被监禁患者的比较研究]
Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1992 Dec;150(10):741-5; discussion 745-6.
6
Emerging problems for staff associated with the release of potentially dangerous forensic patients.与释放潜在危险的法医鉴定患者相关的工作人员面临的新问题。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1988;16(4):309-20.
7
["Serious crimes during treatment in legal psychiatric commitment (section 63 StGB)."Comment on the contribution by R. Freese et a].["在法定精神科住院治疗期间的严重犯罪行为(《德国刑法典》第63条)。对R. Freese等人文章的评论"]
Nervenarzt. 1997 May;68(5):434-7.
8
['Commitment-adequate' personality diagnosis using the Seitz (revised) Personality Questionnaire for Prisoners within the scope of forensic-psychologic-psychiatric expert assessment].在法医 - 心理 - 精神病学专家评估范围内,使用塞茨(修订版)囚犯人格问卷进行“承诺 - 充分”人格诊断
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz). 1989 May;41(5):280-7.
9
[Regulation on preventive detention according to section sign 66 of the German Penal Code. Principles and differential indication compared with the regulation according to section sign 63 of the German Penal code].[依据《德国刑法典》第66条进行预防性拘留的规定。与依据《德国刑法典》第63条的规定相比的原则及差别适用]
Nervenarzt. 2004 Nov;75(11):1061-7. doi: 10.1007/s00115-004-1735-2.
10
The treatment of personality-disordered offenders in Germany.德国对患有人格障碍的罪犯的治疗。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2007;35(2):229-34.