Arora Surender K, McFarlane Samy I
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.
Nutr Metab (Lond). 2005 Jul 14;2:16. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-2-16.
A low fat, high carbohydrate diet in combination with regular exercise is the traditional recommendation for treating diabetes. Compliance with these lifestyle modifications is less than satisfactory, however, and a high carbohydrate diet raises postprandial plasma glucose and insulin secretion, thereby increasing risk of CVD, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity and diabetes. Moreover, the current epidemic of diabetes and obesity has been, over the past three decades, accompanied by a significant decrease in fat consumption and an increase in carbohydrate consumption. This apparent failure of the traditional diet, from a public health point of view, indicates that alternative dietary approaches are needed. Because carbohydrate is the major secretagogue of insulin, some form of carbohydrate restriction is a prima facie candidate for dietary control of diabetes. Evidence from various randomized controlled trials in recent years has convinced us that such diets are safe and effective, at least in short-term. These data show low carbohydrate diets to be comparable or better than traditional low fat high carbohydrate diets for weight reduction, improvement in the dyslipidemia of diabetes and metabolic syndrome as well as control of blood pressure, postprandial glycemia and insulin secretion. Furthermore, the ability of low carbohydrate diets to reduce triglycerides and to increase HDL is of particular importance. Resistance to such strategies has been due, in part, to equating it with the popular Atkins diet. However, there are many variations and room for individual physician planning. Some form of low carbohydrate diet, in combination with exercise, is a viable option for patients with diabetes. However, the extreme reduction of carbohydrate of popular diets (<30 g/day) cannot be recommended for a diabetic population at this time without further study. On the other hand, the dire objections continually raised in the literature appear to have very little scientific basis. Whereas it is traditional to say that more work needs to be done, the same is true of the assumed standard low fat diets which have an ambiguous record at best. We see current trends in the national dietary recommendations as a positive sign and an appropriate move in the right direction.
低脂、高碳水化合物饮食结合规律运动是治疗糖尿病的传统建议。然而,对这些生活方式改变的依从性并不理想,而且高碳水化合物饮食会升高餐后血糖和胰岛素分泌,从而增加患心血管疾病(CVD)、高血压、血脂异常、肥胖症和糖尿病的风险。此外,在过去三十年中,糖尿病和肥胖症的流行伴随着脂肪摄入量的显著下降和碳水化合物摄入量的增加。从公共卫生的角度来看,传统饮食的这种明显失败表明需要替代的饮食方法。由于碳水化合物是胰岛素的主要促分泌剂,某种形式的碳水化合物限制是糖尿病饮食控制的初步候选方法。近年来各种随机对照试验的证据使我们相信,这样的饮食至少在短期内是安全有效的。这些数据表明,低碳水化合物饮食在减轻体重、改善糖尿病和代谢综合征的血脂异常以及控制血压、餐后血糖和胰岛素分泌方面与传统的低脂高碳水化合物饮食相当或更好。此外,低碳水化合物饮食降低甘油三酯和增加高密度脂蛋白(HDL)的能力尤为重要。对这些策略的抵制部分是由于将其与流行的阿特金斯饮食等同起来。然而,有许多变化,也有医生个人规划的空间。某种形式的低碳水化合物饮食结合运动,对于糖尿病患者来说是一个可行的选择。然而,目前不建议糖尿病患者在没有进一步研究的情况下采用流行饮食中极端的碳水化合物减少量(<30克/天)。另一方面,文献中不断提出的强烈反对意见似乎几乎没有科学依据。虽然传统观点认为还需要做更多的工作,但同样的情况也适用于假定的标准低脂饮食,其记录充其量也不明确。我们将国家饮食建议的当前趋势视为一个积极的信号,是朝着正确方向迈出的适当一步。