Gallagher Shaun, Brøsted Sørensen Jesper
Department of Philosophy, Cognitive Sciences, University of Central Florida, USA.
Conscious Cogn. 2006 Mar;15(1):119-34. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.03.002. Epub 2005 Jul 12.
We review the use of introspective and phenomenological methods in experimental settings. We distinguish different senses of introspection, and further distinguish phenomenological method from introspectionist approaches. Two ways of using phenomenology in experimental procedures are identified: first, the neurophenomenological method, proposed by Varela, involves the training of experimental subjects. This approach has been directly and productively incorporated into the protocol of experiments on perception. A second approach may have wider application and does not involve training experimental subjects in phenomenological method. It requires front-loading phenomenological insights into experimental design. A number of experiments employing this approach are reviewed. We conclude with a discussion of the implications for both the cognitive sciences and phenomenology.
我们回顾了内省法和现象学方法在实验环境中的应用。我们区分了内省的不同含义,并进一步将现象学方法与内省主义方法区分开来。确定了在实验过程中运用现象学的两种方式:其一,由瓦雷拉提出的神经现象学方法,涉及对实验对象的训练。这种方法已被直接且有效地纳入感知实验的方案中。第二种方法可能具有更广泛的应用,且不涉及对实验对象进行现象学方法的训练。它要求在实验设计中预先融入现象学见解。我们回顾了一些采用这种方法的实验。最后,我们讨论了其对认知科学和现象学的意义。