Brooks K L, Shepherd J M
Department of Nursing, Millersville University, PA.
J Prof Nurs. 1992 Mar-Apr;8(2):87-95. doi: 10.1016/8755-7223(92)90068-a.
This descriptive study was undertaken to investigate the relationship between professionalism and critical thinking abilities of senior nursing students in four types of nursing educational programs: generic baccalaureate, associate, and diploma--the basic registered nurse (RN) programs--along with the upper division baccalaureate, specifically RN completion, program. Fifty students from each type of program were conveniently selected during the same spring semester before graduation. Professionalism was measured by the Health Care Professional Attitude Inventory; general critical thinking abilities, by the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. For individual programs, low to moderate correlations ranging from r = 0.263 (diploma) to 0.516 (upper division) were found between critical thinking and professionalism. This culminated in a significant, low positive correlation (r = 0.447) between critical thinking and professionalism across all programs. Upper division seniors showed significant low to moderate positive correlations for age with critical thinking (r = 0.487) and professionalism (r = 0.327) that were not observed in the other programs. Comparisons of professionalism scores among programs showed that upper division seniors scored highest. The measure of professionalism for seniors from 4-year generic programs was not significantly different from associate degree seniors. Diploma program seniors showed the lowest level of professionalism. When critical thinking abilities were compared, seniors from generic and upper division baccalaureate programs showed significantly higher levels than those from associate and diploma programs.
普通学士学位、副学士学位和文凭——基本注册护士(RN)项目——以及高年级学士学位,特别是RN完成项目。在毕业前的同一个春季学期,从每种项目中方便地选取了50名学生。专业素养通过《医疗保健专业态度量表》进行测量;一般批判性思维能力通过《沃森-格拉泽批判性思维评估》进行测量。对于各个项目,批判性思维与专业素养之间的相关性较低至中等,范围从r = 0.263(文凭项目)到0.516(高年级项目)。在所有项目中,批判性思维与专业素养之间最终呈现出显著的低正相关(r = 0.447)。高年级学生中,年龄与批判性思维(r = 0.487)和专业素养(r = 0.327)之间存在显著的低至中等正相关,而在其他项目中未观察到这种情况。各项目之间专业素养得分的比较表明,高年级学生得分最高。4年制普通项目的高年级学生的专业素养测量得分与副学士学位高年级学生的得分没有显著差异。文凭项目的高年级学生专业素养水平最低。当比较批判性思维能力时,普通学士学位和高年级学士学位项目的高年级学生表现出比副学士学位和文凭项目的学生显著更高的水平。