慕尼黑昼夜节律问卷与霍恩-奥斯特伯格晨型-夜型评分的比较。
Comparison of the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire with the Horne-Ostberg's Morningness-Eveningness Score.
作者信息
Zavada Andrei, Gordijn Marijke C M, Beersma Domien G M, Daan Serge, Roenneberg Till
机构信息
Unit of Behavioural Biology, Human Chronobiology Research Group, University of Groningen, Haren, The Netherlands.
出版信息
Chronobiol Int. 2005;22(2):267-78. doi: 10.1081/cbi-200053536.
We report on results from an Internet survey of sleeping habits in a Dutch population using the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ), supplemented with the Horne-Ostberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ). The MCTQ was completed by 5,055 responders, of which 2,481 also completed the MEQ. MEQ score correlated well with the MCTQ assessment of time of mid-sleep on free days (MSF; r = - 0.73) and on workdays (MSW; r = - 0.61). MEQ was more strongly correlated with MSF (50% of sleep time) than with sleep onset (0%), rise time (100%), or with any other percentile (10 to 40, 60% to 90%) of sleep on free days. The study shows that chronotype (based on MSF as measured by the MCTQ) strongly correlates with morningness-eveningness (as measured by the MEQ). However, the MCTQ collects additional detailed information on sleep-wake behavior under natural conditions.
我们报告了一项针对荷兰人群睡眠习惯的网络调查结果，该调查使用了慕尼黑时间类型问卷（MCTQ），并辅以霍恩-奥斯特伯格晨型-夜型问卷（MEQ）。5055名受访者完成了MCTQ，其中2481人还完成了MEQ。MEQ得分与MCTQ对休息日中间睡眠时间（MSF；r = - 0.73）和工作日中间睡眠时间（MSW；r = - 0.61）的评估相关性良好。与休息日睡眠开始时间（0%）、起床时间（100%）或任何其他百分位数（10%至40%、60%至90%）相比，MEQ与MSF（睡眠时间的50%）的相关性更强。研究表明，时间类型（基于MCTQ测量的MSF）与晨型-夜型（由MEQ测量）密切相关。然而，MCTQ收集了自然条件下睡眠-觉醒行为的其他详细信息。
Zotero 插件