El-Mowafy Omar, El-Badrawy Wafa, Lewis Donald W, Shokati Babak, Kermalli Jaffer, Soliman Osama, Encioiu Avedis, Zawi Rema, Rajwani Fatma
Restorative Dentistry, University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2005 Jun;136(6):766-73; quiz 806-7. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0260.
The authors conducted a study to determine light intensity and heat/glare measurements of quartztungsten-halogen (QTH) light polymerization units used in dental offices.
Research assistants visited 100 dental offices and assessed 214 QTH light units. They recorded each unit's model, age, service history, light intensity and heat/glare emissions.
Mean light intensity was 526 milliwatts per square centimeter (120-1,000 mW/cm2), with 26 units having intensity less than 300 mW/cm2. The mean light unit age was 5.6 years. Light units older than three years had significantly lower output intensities than those that were one, two or three years old. The authors found a wide range of heat/glare measurements (3-300 mW/cm2), with 4.6 percent of the units having values greater than 50 mW/cm2, including three with values of more than 200 mW/cm2. The mean light intensity of units serviced in the preceding year was 539 mW/cm2; it was 418 mW/cm2 for units serviced from one to six years previously.
Light intensity and heat/glare values varied among the 214 units; some units had values well outside the recommended levels. Each unit's age and service history significantly affected its intensity. An awareness campaign is needed to promote testing, repair or replacement of light polymerization units. Periodic testing of light polymerization units should be considered by regulatory bodies to ensure optimum quality of composite restorations.
Light polymerization units in some private dental offices in Toronto had intensities that may result in composites restorations with inferior properties. Dentists need to regularly monitor the intensity of the light polymerization units and maintain the units to ensure quality composite restorations.
作者开展了一项研究,以确定牙科诊所中使用的石英钨卤素(QTH)光固化机的光强度以及热/眩光测量值。
研究助手走访了100家牙科诊所,评估了214台QTH光固化机。他们记录了每台光固化机的型号、使用年限、维修历史、光强度以及热/眩光排放情况。
平均光强度为每平方厘米526毫瓦(120 - 1,000毫瓦/平方厘米),有26台光固化机的强度低于300毫瓦/平方厘米。光固化机的平均使用年限为5.6年。使用年限超过三年的光固化机的输出强度明显低于使用一、二或三年的光固化机。作者发现热/眩光测量值范围很广(3 - 300毫瓦/平方厘米),4.6%的光固化机测量值大于50毫瓦/平方厘米,其中三台测量值超过200毫瓦/平方厘米。上一年维修过的光固化机的平均光强度为539毫瓦/平方厘米;而一至六年前维修过的光固化机的平均光强度为418毫瓦/平方厘米。
214台光固化机的光强度和热/眩光值各不相同;一些光固化机的值远超出推荐水平。每台光固化机的使用年限和维修历史对其强度有显著影响。需要开展一场宣传活动,以促进对光固化机进行检测、维修或更换。监管机构应考虑定期对光固化机进行检测,以确保复合树脂修复体的最佳质量。
多伦多一些私人牙科诊所的光固化机强度可能会导致复合树脂修复体性能不佳。牙医需要定期监测光固化机的强度,并维护这些设备,以确保高质量的复合树脂修复体。