Suppr超能文献

已发表的种族分类数据与自我报告种族之间的差异:来自2002年北卡罗来纳州出生记录的证据。

Discrepancies between published data on racial classification and self-reported race: evidence from the 2002 North Carolina live birth records.

作者信息

Buescher Paul A, Gizlice Ziya, Jones-Vessey Kathleen A

机构信息

State Center for Health Statistics, North Carolina Division of Public Health, Raleigh, NC 27699-1908, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 2005 Jul-Aug;120(4):393-8. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000406.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We compared data on race as reported by the mother on North Carolina birth certificates with data on race in officially reported statistics. We also determined to what extent differences in the classification of race affect measures of racial disparity in maternal and child health indicators.

METHODS

We examined how data on race are collected, coded, and tabulated in North Carolina via live birth certificates, death certificates, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) telephone survey, and the Central Cancer Registry case records. We showed how the data on race collected through North Carolina birth and death certificates are translated into 10 fixed racial categories designated by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) for use in official vital statistics. We compared race as reported by the mother on birth certificates to racial tabulations used in the official published birth statistics. We also examined to what extent differences in the determination of race affect measures of racial disparity in maternal and child health indicators.

RESULTS

Out of nearly 118,000 live births in North Carolina in 2002, mothers reported more than 600 different versions of race on birth certificates. These entries were collapsed into the 10 standard racial categories outlined in federal coding rules. Approximately two-thirds of mothers of Hispanic ethnicity report their race with a label that can be categorized as "Other" race, but nearly all of these births are re-coded to "white" for the official birth statistics. Measures of racial disparity vary depending on whether self-reported or officially coded race is used.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that, given the opportunity to report their own race, North Carolinians describe their race using a wide variety of terms and concepts. In contrast, health statistics are usually reported using a few standardized racial categories defined by federal policy. The NCHS rules for coding race should be reexamined. As the ethnic and racial diversity of the United States continues to increase, these rules will become increasingly antiquated.

摘要

目的

我们将北卡罗来纳州出生证明上母亲报告的种族数据与官方报告统计中的种族数据进行了比较。我们还确定了种族分类差异在多大程度上影响母婴健康指标中的种族差异衡量标准。

方法

我们研究了北卡罗来纳州如何通过出生证明、死亡证明、行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)电话调查以及中央癌症登记处病例记录来收集、编码和制表种族数据。我们展示了通过北卡罗来纳州出生和死亡证明收集的种族数据如何被转换为国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)指定的10个固定种族类别,用于官方生命统计。我们将出生证明上母亲报告的种族与官方公布的出生统计中使用的种族列表进行了比较。我们还研究了种族确定差异在多大程度上影响母婴健康指标中的种族差异衡量标准。

结果

在2002年北卡罗来纳州近118,000例活产中,母亲们在出生证明上报告了600多种不同的种族版本。这些记录被合并为联邦编码规则中概述的10个标准种族类别。大约三分之二的西班牙裔母亲报告的种族标签可归类为“其他”种族,但在官方出生统计中,几乎所有这些出生都被重新编码为“白人”。种族差异衡量标准因使用自我报告的种族还是官方编码的种族而有所不同。

结论

本研究表明,在有机会报告自己的种族时,北卡罗来纳州居民使用各种各样的术语和概念来描述自己的种族。相比之下,健康统计数据通常使用联邦政策定义的少数标准化种族类别来报告。NCHS种族编码规则应重新审视。随着美国的种族和民族多样性持续增加,这些规则将变得越来越过时。

相似文献

2
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Infant Mortality in North Carolina, 2008-2009.
N C Med J. 2016 Nov-Dec;77(6):373-377. doi: 10.18043/ncm.77.6.373.

引用本文的文献

2
Addressing maternal and infant health inequities requires improved birth record data collection.
Nat Med. 2025 Feb;31(2):358-359. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03472-y.
6
Assessing an electronic self-report method for improving quality of ethnicity and race data in the Veterans Health Administration.
JAMIA Open. 2023 Apr 12;6(2):ooad020. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad020. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
Hurricane Florence and suicide mortality in North Carolina: a controlled interrupted time-series analysis.
Inj Prev. 2023 Apr;29(2):180-185. doi: 10.1136/ip-2022-044709. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
8
Defining an Infant's Race and Ethnicity: A Systematic Review.
Pediatrics. 2023 Jan 1;151(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-058756.
9
Short Report: Race and Ethnicity Misclassification in Kidney Transplantation Research.
Transplant Direct. 2022 Sep 16;8(10):e1373. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001373. eCollection 2022 Oct.
10
Medication Use Among Patients With COVID-19 in a Large, National Dataset: Cerner Real-World Data™.
Clin Ther. 2021 Jun;43(6):e173-e196. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.03.024. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Health and behavior risks of adolescents with mixed-race identity.
Am J Public Health. 2003 Nov;93(11):1865-70. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.11.1865.
2
Validity of racial/ethnic classifications in medical records data: an exploratory study.
Am J Public Health. 2003 Jul;93(7):1084-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.7.1084.
3
Use of race and ethnicity in biomedical publication.
JAMA. 2003 May 28;289(20):2709-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.20.2709.
4
Problems with access to dental care for Medicaid-insured children: what caregivers think.
Am J Public Health. 2002 Jan;92(1):53-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.1.53.
5
The color line: race matters in the elimination of health disparities.
Am J Public Health. 2001 Jul;91(7):1046-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.7.1046.
6
Race/ethnicity and OMB Directive 15: implications for state public health practice.
Am J Public Health. 2000 Nov;90(11):1714-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1714.
7
Racial injustice in health care.
N Engl J Med. 2000 Apr 6;342(14):1045-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200004063421411.
9
How inconsistencies in racial classification demystify the race construct in public health statistics.
Epidemiology. 1999 Mar;10(2):101-3. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199903000-00001.
10
Analyzing socioeconomic and racial/ethnic patterns in health and health care.
Am J Public Health. 1993 Aug;83(8):1086-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.8.1086.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验