Buescher Paul A, Gizlice Ziya, Jones-Vessey Kathleen A
State Center for Health Statistics, North Carolina Division of Public Health, Raleigh, NC 27699-1908, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2005 Jul-Aug;120(4):393-8. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000406.
We compared data on race as reported by the mother on North Carolina birth certificates with data on race in officially reported statistics. We also determined to what extent differences in the classification of race affect measures of racial disparity in maternal and child health indicators.
We examined how data on race are collected, coded, and tabulated in North Carolina via live birth certificates, death certificates, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) telephone survey, and the Central Cancer Registry case records. We showed how the data on race collected through North Carolina birth and death certificates are translated into 10 fixed racial categories designated by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) for use in official vital statistics. We compared race as reported by the mother on birth certificates to racial tabulations used in the official published birth statistics. We also examined to what extent differences in the determination of race affect measures of racial disparity in maternal and child health indicators.
Out of nearly 118,000 live births in North Carolina in 2002, mothers reported more than 600 different versions of race on birth certificates. These entries were collapsed into the 10 standard racial categories outlined in federal coding rules. Approximately two-thirds of mothers of Hispanic ethnicity report their race with a label that can be categorized as "Other" race, but nearly all of these births are re-coded to "white" for the official birth statistics. Measures of racial disparity vary depending on whether self-reported or officially coded race is used.
This study shows that, given the opportunity to report their own race, North Carolinians describe their race using a wide variety of terms and concepts. In contrast, health statistics are usually reported using a few standardized racial categories defined by federal policy. The NCHS rules for coding race should be reexamined. As the ethnic and racial diversity of the United States continues to increase, these rules will become increasingly antiquated.
我们将北卡罗来纳州出生证明上母亲报告的种族数据与官方报告统计中的种族数据进行了比较。我们还确定了种族分类差异在多大程度上影响母婴健康指标中的种族差异衡量标准。
我们研究了北卡罗来纳州如何通过出生证明、死亡证明、行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)电话调查以及中央癌症登记处病例记录来收集、编码和制表种族数据。我们展示了通过北卡罗来纳州出生和死亡证明收集的种族数据如何被转换为国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)指定的10个固定种族类别,用于官方生命统计。我们将出生证明上母亲报告的种族与官方公布的出生统计中使用的种族列表进行了比较。我们还研究了种族确定差异在多大程度上影响母婴健康指标中的种族差异衡量标准。
在2002年北卡罗来纳州近118,000例活产中,母亲们在出生证明上报告了600多种不同的种族版本。这些记录被合并为联邦编码规则中概述的10个标准种族类别。大约三分之二的西班牙裔母亲报告的种族标签可归类为“其他”种族,但在官方出生统计中,几乎所有这些出生都被重新编码为“白人”。种族差异衡量标准因使用自我报告的种族还是官方编码的种族而有所不同。
本研究表明,在有机会报告自己的种族时,北卡罗来纳州居民使用各种各样的术语和概念来描述自己的种族。相比之下,健康统计数据通常使用联邦政策定义的少数标准化种族类别来报告。NCHS种族编码规则应重新审视。随着美国的种族和民族多样性持续增加,这些规则将变得越来越过时。