Lysack Catherine, Dama Michael, Neufeld Stewart, Andreassi Eileen
Gerontology and Occupational Therapy, Wayne State University, and Research Associate, Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA.
J Allied Health. 2005 Summer;34(2):76-82.
Computerized educational technology, in various forms, is permeating the health care setting, and clinicians and program managers are charged with evaluating its potential to improve patient health outcomes. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to compare two alternative methods of therapeutic exercise instruction in a sample of orthopedic rehabilitation patients (n = 40). The traditional (control) group received routine inpatient rehabilitation exercise education from physical therapists (using demonstrations, verbal feedback, and written materials), and the technology (intervention) group received routine care as described plus one additional therapeutic session in which a customized set of exercises was downloaded from a computerized database to videotape by each patient's therapist and given to the patient for continued use at home. Data on patient compliance and patient satisfaction were collected at patient discharge and at four-week follow-up using a questionnaire designed specifically for this study. Analysis of results showed no significant differences in patient compliance or patient satisfaction between the two study groups. Results of this randomized trial suggest that computerized patient education technology may not provide the benefits anticipated.
各种形式的计算机化教育技术正在渗透到医疗保健环境中,临床医生和项目管理人员负责评估其改善患者健康结果的潜力。这项随机对照试验的目的是比较两组骨科康复患者(n = 40)的两种替代性治疗性运动指导方法。传统(对照组)接受物理治疗师的常规住院康复运动教育(使用示范、口头反馈和书面材料),技术(干预组)接受上述常规护理,外加一次额外的治疗课程,每位患者的治疗师从计算机化数据库中下载一套定制的运动视频,交给患者以便在家中继续使用。在患者出院时和四周随访时,使用专门为此研究设计的问卷收集患者依从性和患者满意度的数据。结果分析显示,两个研究组在患者依从性或患者满意度方面没有显著差异。这项随机试验的结果表明,计算机化患者教育技术可能无法提供预期的益处。