Wen Ming, Christakis Nicholas A
Department of Sociology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2005 Aug;40(4):1108-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00398.x.
Place of residence is associated with health outcomes.
To examine neighborhood effects on mortality after the onset of serious disease and to assess whether these effects vary for different sociodemographic or diagnostic subgroups.
DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: Our sample consists of a complete cohort of 10,557 elderly Medicare beneficiaries throughout the city of Chicago newly diagnosed and hospitalized for the first time with one of five common serious diseases in 1993 (stroke, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, hip fracture, and lung cancer) followed until 1999. Attributes of 51 zip code neighborhoods were obtained both from census data (1990) and from a comprehensive social survey of neighborhood residents (1994-1995). Cox proportional hazards models with robust standard errors were specified.
Survival after hospitalization.
People who lived in neighborhoods with higher socioeconomic status (SES) or with a better social environment had significantly longer survival after disease onset. We evaluated the differential impact of neighborhood attributes on survival depending on gender, race, and poverty using interaction terms. Only the interaction terms between neighborhood social-structural factors and individual poverty were significant, suggesting that neighborhood SES and social environment were especially helpful for people with higher income. Neighborhood attributes did not differ in their impact depending on the race or sex of the subjects. Analyses of cause-specific mortality showed that myocardial infarction was the primary force driving the associations between neighborhood attributes and mortality.
Where people live matters with respect to posthospitalization mortality, but how neighborhoods affect this outcome depends on individual demographic and diagnostic characteristics. Myocardial infarction in particular may be a "neighborhood sensitive" condition. Individuals' health may depend not just on individuals' characteristics but also on their neighborhoods'.
居住地点与健康结果相关。
研究严重疾病发病后社区环境对死亡率的影响,并评估这些影响在不同社会人口统计学或诊断亚组中是否存在差异。
设计、地点、患者:我们的样本包括1993年在芝加哥市首次被新诊断并住院的10557名老年医疗保险受益人的完整队列,他们患有五种常见严重疾病之一(中风、心肌梗死、充血性心力衰竭、髋部骨折和肺癌),随访至1999年。从人口普查数据(1990年)和对社区居民的全面社会调查(1994 - 1995年)中获取了51个邮政编码社区的属性。指定了具有稳健标准误差的Cox比例风险模型。
住院后的生存率。
生活在社会经济地位(SES)较高或社会环境较好社区的人在疾病发作后的生存时间显著更长。我们使用交互项评估了社区属性对生存的差异影响,具体取决于性别、种族和贫困状况。只有社区社会结构因素与个人贫困之间的交互项显著,这表明社区SES和社会环境对高收入人群特别有帮助。社区属性对生存的影响在不同种族或性别的受试者中没有差异。特定病因死亡率分析表明,心肌梗死是推动社区属性与死亡率之间关联的主要因素。
人们的居住地点对住院后死亡率很重要,但社区如何影响这一结果取决于个体的人口统计学和诊断特征。特别是心肌梗死可能是一种“对社区敏感”的疾病。个人的健康可能不仅取决于个人特征,还取决于他们所在的社区。