Wu Ning, Miller Susan C, Lapane Kate, Roy Jason, Mor Vincent
Health Research and Evaluation, Abt Associates Inc., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2005 Aug;40(4):1197-216. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00400.x.
To examine facility variation in data quality of the level of pain documented in the minimum data set (MDS) as a function of level of hospice enrollment in nursing homes (NHs).
Clinical assessments on 3,469 nonhospice residents from 178 NHs were merged with On-line Survey Certification and Reporting data of 2000, Medicare Claims data of 2000 and the MDS of 2000-2002.
Using the same assessment protocol, NH staff and study nurses independently assessed 3,469 nonhospice residents. Study nurses' assessments being gold standard, we quantified and compared quality of NH staff's pain rating across NHs with high, medium, or low hospice use. Multilevel models were built to assess the effect of NH hospice use levels on the occurrence of false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) errors in NH-rated "severe pain."
Of 178 NHs, 25 had medium and 41 high hospice use. NHs with higher hospice use had lower sensitivities. In multilevel analysis, we found a significant facility-level variation in the probability of FP and FN errors in facility-rated "severe pain." Resident characteristics only explained 4 and 0 percent of the facility variation in FP and FN, respectively; characteristics and locations (state) of NHs further explained 53 and 52 percent of the variance. After controlling for resident and NH characteristics, staff in NHs with medium or high hospice use were less likely to have FP or FN errors in their MDS documentation of pain than were staff in NHs with low or no hospice use.
The examination of data quality of pooled MDS data from multiple NHs is insufficient. Multilevel analysis is needed to elucidate sources of heterogeneity in the quality of MDS data across NHs. Facility characteristics, e.g., hospice use or NH location, are systematically associated with overrated/underrated pain and may bias pain quality indicator (QI) comparisons. To ensure the integrity of QI comparison in the NH setting, the government may need to institute regular audits of MDS data quality.
研究疗养院(NHs)临终关怀登记水平对最低数据集(MDS)中记录的疼痛程度数据质量的机构差异。
来自178家NHs的3469名非临终关怀居民的临床评估数据与2000年的在线调查认证和报告数据、2000年的医疗保险索赔数据以及2000 - 2002年的MDS数据进行了合并。
采用相同的评估方案,NHs工作人员和研究护士对3469名非临终关怀居民进行了独立评估。以研究护士的评估为金标准,我们对临终关怀使用率高、中、低的NHs中NHs工作人员的疼痛评分质量进行了量化和比较。构建了多层次模型,以评估NHs临终关怀使用水平对NHs评定为“重度疼痛”时假阳性(FP)和假阴性(FN)错误发生率的影响。
在178家NHs中,25家临终关怀使用率中等,41家使用率高。临终关怀使用率较高的NHs敏感性较低。在多层次分析中,我们发现在机构评定为“重度疼痛”时,FP和FN错误的概率存在显著的机构水平差异。居民特征分别仅解释了FP和FN中机构差异的4%和0%;NHs的特征和地点(州)进一步解释了方差的53%和52%。在控制了居民和NHs特征后,与临终关怀使用率低或无临终关怀使用的NHs工作人员相比,临终关怀使用率中等或高的NHs工作人员在其MDS疼痛记录中出现FP或FN错误的可能性较小。
对多个NHs汇总的MDS数据质量的检查是不够的。需要进行多层次分析以阐明NHs之间MDS数据质量异质性的来源。机构特征,如临终关怀使用情况或NHs地点,与疼痛高估/低估系统相关,可能会使疼痛质量指标(QI)比较产生偏差。为确保NHs环境中QI比较的完整性,政府可能需要对MDS数据质量进行定期审计。