Suppr超能文献

评估临终关怀对疗养院居民疼痛影响时的评估偏差问题。

The problem of assessment bias when measuring the hospice effect on nursing home residents' pain.

作者信息

Wu Ning, Miller Susan C, Lapane Kate, Gozalo Pedro

机构信息

Department of Community Health, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Nov;26(5):998-1009. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(03)00328-2.

Abstract

This study examined the observed differential documentation of pain on nursing home (NH) resident assessments (minimum data sets [MDS]) when dying residents were and were not enrolled in hospice. We studied 9,613 NH residents who died in 6 states in 1999 and 2000. Documented pain was compared among three groups of residents who were categorized by their hospice exposure. At the time of their last MDS completion, residents in hospice were more likely to receive opioids for their moderate to severe pain than were non-hospice residents and residents enrolled in hospice after the last MDS assessments. However, hospice residents were twice as likely as non-hospice residents and 1.3 times as likely as residents who eventually enrolled in hospice to have pain documented. These counterintuitive findings suggest that there is differential documentation of pain on the MDS when hospice is involved in care, perhaps because of superior pain assessment by hospice.

摘要

本研究调查了在疗养院(NH)居民评估(最小数据集 [MDS])中,临终居民是否参加临终关怀时疼痛记录的差异。我们研究了1999年和2000年在6个州死亡的9613名NH居民。根据临终关怀接触情况将居民分为三组,比较了三组居民的疼痛记录情况。在最后一次完成MDS时,参加临终关怀的居民因中度至重度疼痛接受阿片类药物治疗的可能性高于未参加临终关怀的居民以及在最后一次MDS评估后参加临终关怀的居民。然而,参加临终关怀的居民记录疼痛的可能性是非临终关怀居民的两倍,是最终参加临终关怀居民的1.3倍。这些与直觉相悖的发现表明,当临终关怀参与护理时,MDS上的疼痛记录存在差异,这可能是因为临终关怀进行了更优质的疼痛评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验