Suppr超能文献

基于人群的双胞胎样本中注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)及共病精神病理学的系统评估。

A systematic evaluation of ADHD and comorbid psychopathology in a population-based twin sample.

作者信息

Volk Heather E, Neuman Rosalind J, Todd Richard D

机构信息

Doctoral Program in Public Health Studies, Saint Louis University School of Public Health, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005 Aug;44(8):768-75. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000166173.72815.83.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Clinical and population samples demonstrate that attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) occurs with other disorders. Comorbid disorder clustering within ADHD subtypes is not well studied.

METHOD

Latent class analysis (LCA) examined the co-occurrence of DSM-IV ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), conduct disorder (CD), and depression symptoms in a population twin sample. The authors fit separate models for ADHD and comorbid disorder symptoms. Twin concordance ratios (monozygotic versus dizygotic) were compared examining genetic influence on class membership.

RESULTS

LCA of ADHD symptoms resulted in seven classes including inattentive, combined, and hyperactive subtypes in 1,616 subjects. The few ADHD symptoms (53.4%) and severe inattentive (12.3%) classes were most frequent. LCA of ODD, CD, and depression symptoms in 1,587 subjects revealed five classes including ODD (19.4%), depression (14.5%), and two composite classes: ODD/CD (6.9%) and ODD/CD/depression (7.2%). Internalizing and externalizing comorbid disorders were present across all ADHD subtypes. Odds ratios (ORs) for twin concordance indicate genetic influence on severe inattentive (OR = 4.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52-11.53) and combined (OR = 5.25; 95% CI, 1.32-20.78) ADHD classes and ODD (OR = 1.49; 95% CI, 0.70-3.17), ODD/CD (OR = 3.32; 95% CI, 0.57-19.28), and ODD/CD/depression (OR = 1.20; 95% CI, 0.30-4.77) classes.

CONCLUSIONS

Internalizing and externalizing disorders did not cluster differentially within ADHD subtypes. LCA may provide a more precise characterization of comorbidity with ADHD.

摘要

目的

临床和人群样本表明,注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)常与其他疾病共发。ADHD各亚型中共病障碍的聚集情况尚未得到充分研究。

方法

潜在类别分析(LCA)研究了一个双生子人群样本中DSM-IV ADHD、对立违抗障碍(ODD)、品行障碍(CD)和抑郁症状的共现情况。作者为ADHD症状和共病症状分别建立了模型。比较了同卵双生子与异卵双生子的一致性比率,以检验基因对类别归属的影响。

结果

对1616名受试者的ADHD症状进行LCA分析,得出七个类别,包括注意力不集中型、混合型和多动型亚型。症状较少的ADHD(53.4%)和严重注意力不集中型(12.3%)类别最为常见。对1587名受试者的ODD、CD和抑郁症状进行LCA分析,发现五个类别,包括ODD(19.4%)、抑郁(14.5%),以及两个综合类别:ODD/CD(6.9%)和ODD/CD/抑郁(7.2%)。内化和外化共病障碍在所有ADHD亚型中均有出现。双生子一致性的优势比(OR)表明,基因对严重注意力不集中型(OR = 4.18;95%置信区间[CI],1.52 - 11.53)、混合型(OR = 5.25;95% CI,1.32 - 20.78)ADHD类别以及ODD(OR = 1.49;95% CI,0.70 - 3.17)、ODD/CD(OR = 3.32;95% CI,0.57 - 19.28)和ODD/CD/抑郁(OR = 1.20;95% CI,0.30 - 4.77)类别有影响。

结论

内化和外化障碍在ADHD各亚型中并非有差异地聚集。LCA可能为ADHD的共病情况提供更精确的特征描述。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验