Green J, Kirwan J, Tierney J, Vale C, Symonds P, Fresco L, Williams C, Collingwood M
Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology, Clatterbridge Hospital, Merseyside, UK, L63 4JY.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD002225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002225.pub2.
The National Cancer Institute (USA) alert in February 1999 stated that concomitant chemoradiotherapy should be considered for all patients with cervical cancer, based on evidence from five randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
To review all known RCTs comparing concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy with radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
We searched electronic databases, trials registers and reference lists of published trial reports and review articles were also searched.
This review includes RCTs in cervical cancer comparing concomitant chemoradiation with radiotherapy in the experimental arm. Trials allowing further adjuvant chemotherapy or hydroxyurea were included. Trials using radiosensitisers or radioprotectors in the experimental arm were excluded.
Two authors reviewed trials for inclusion and extracted data. For meta-analyses of time-to-event outcomes (survival, progression-free survival), a hazard ratio (HR) was extracted or estimated from trial reports, where possible. Only overall rates of local and distant recurrence were presented in many reports so only odds ratios (OR) of recurrence rates could be calculated, which takes no account of time to recurrence or censoring. Few trials reported acute toxicity adequately, but where possible ORs were calculated for the main types and severities of acute toxicity. The HRs and ORs for individual trials were combined across all trials, using the fixed effect model. Late toxicity was rarely described in sufficient detail so could only be reviewed qualitatively.
The original review was based on nineteen trials (17 published and two unpublished) including 4580 patients. This update includes twenty four trials (21 published, 3 unpublished) and 4921 patients, although due to patient exclusion and differential reporting 61% to 75% were available for the analyses. The review strongly suggests chemoradiation improves overall survival and progression free survival, whether or not platinum was used with absolute benefits of 10% and 13% respectively. There was, however, statistical heterogeneity for these outcomes. There was some evidence that the effect was greater in trials including a high proportion of stage I and II patients. Chemoradiation also showed significant benefit for local recurrence and a suggestion of a benefit for distant recurrence. Acute haematological and gastrointestinal toxicity was significantly greater in the concomitant chemoradiation group. Late effects of treatment were not well reported and so the impact of chemoradiation on these effects could not be determined adequately. Treatment-related deaths were rare.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant chemoradiation appears to improve overall survival and progression-free survival in locally advanced cervical cancer. It also appears to reduce local and distant recurrence suggesting concomitant chemotherapy may afford radiosensitisation and systemic cytotoxic effects. Some acute toxicity is increased, but the long-term side effects are still not clear.
美国国立癌症研究所1999年2月发布的警示指出,基于五项随机对照试验的证据,所有宫颈癌患者均应考虑同步放化疗。
回顾所有比较同步化疗联合放疗与单纯放疗治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的随机对照试验。
我们检索了电子数据库、试验注册库,并查阅了已发表试验报告的参考文献列表以及综述文章。
本综述纳入了宫颈癌随机对照试验,试验组采用同步放化疗与单纯放疗进行比较。允许进一步进行辅助化疗或使用羟基脲的试验也纳入其中。试验组使用放射增敏剂或放射防护剂的试验被排除。
两名作者对试验进行评估以确定是否纳入,并提取数据。对于事件发生时间结局(生存、无进展生存)的荟萃分析,尽可能从试验报告中提取或估算风险比(HR)。许多报告仅给出了局部和远处复发的总体发生率,因此只能计算复发率的比值比(OR),这未考虑复发时间或删失情况。很少有试验充分报告急性毒性,但在可能的情况下,对主要类型和严重程度的急性毒性计算了OR。使用固定效应模型将各个试验的HR和OR合并。很少有试验对晚期毒性进行足够详细的描述,因此只能进行定性综述。
原综述基于19项试验(17项已发表,2项未发表),共4580例患者。本次更新纳入了24项试验(21项已发表,3项未发表),共4921例患者,不过由于患者排除和报告差异,61%至75%的患者可用于分析。该综述强烈表明,无论是否使用铂类药物,同步放化疗均可改善总生存和无进展生存,绝对获益分别为10%和13%。然而,这些结局存在统计学异质性。有证据表明,在纳入I期和II期患者比例较高的试验中,该效果更显著。同步放化疗在局部复发方面也显示出显著获益,在远处复发方面也有获益趋势。同步放化疗组的急性血液学和胃肠道毒性明显更大。治疗的晚期效应报告不足,因此无法充分确定同步放化疗对这些效应的影响。与治疗相关的死亡很少见。
同步放化疗似乎可改善局部晚期宫颈癌的总生存和无进展生存。它似乎还能降低局部和远处复发,提示同步化疗可能具有放射增敏和全身细胞毒性作用。一些急性毒性增加,但长期副作用仍不清楚。