• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轮椅设计中不同推进系统的长期使用对印度使用者有氧能力的影响。

Effect of chronic use of different propulsion systems in wheelchair design on the aerobic capacity of Indian users.

作者信息

Mukherjee Goutam, Bhowmik Partha, Samanta Amalendu

机构信息

Department of Occupational Health, All India Institute of Hygiene & Public Health, Kolkata, India.

出版信息

Indian J Med Res. 2005 Jun;121(6):747-58.

PMID:16037619
Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: The use of wheelchairs (WC) of ergonomically different propulsion mechanisms may influence the cardiorespiratory capacity of the WC user. The purpose of the present investigation was to observe the impact of chronic use of four ergonomically different propulsion systems and age of the WC users on their aerobic capacity.

METHODS

The male subjects (n=77), exclusively using hand rim (n=20), arm crank using both arms (n=22), arm crank using one arm (n=17), and arm lever using one arm (n=18) propelled WCs and 20 able-bodied (AB) subjects as the control group participated They performed maximal exercise test in continuous, step-wise incremental workload at a crank rate of 50 rpm on an arm-crank ergometer. The VO(2) and heart rate obtained during 2.45 to 3 min of each test exercise, and VO(2max) and HR(max) were derived respectively. Two-way ANOVA and multiple comparison tests were performed to compare the groups with respect to VO(2max) and HR(max). Age was used as a classificatory variable.

RESULTS

The maximal physiological response of the AB subjects was superior to the WC users but the WC user groups did not show any significant differences amongst them. The aerobic capacity decreased with advancement of age and for WC users this is more pronounced. Equations for age predicted VO(2max) and HR(max) were also derived.

INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: As the WC users used the four distinct propulsion systems, it was anticipated that it would induce variation in the physiological variables of the users. But the results of the study revealed that there was no significant difference. Suggesting that the WC users might have developed certain self-regulatory mechanisms in order to overcome the variation induced by the different propulsion systems.

摘要

背景与目的

使用人体工程学设计不同推进机制的轮椅可能会影响轮椅使用者的心肺功能。本研究的目的是观察长期使用四种人体工程学设计不同的推进系统以及轮椅使用者的年龄对其有氧能力的影响。

方法

男性受试者(n = 77),分别为仅使用手轮圈推进轮椅的(n = 20)、双臂使用曲柄推进轮椅的(n = 22)、单臂使用曲柄推进轮椅的(n = 17)以及单臂使用杠杆推进轮椅的(n = 18),还有20名健全受试者作为对照组参与研究。他们在手臂曲柄测力计上以50转/分钟的曲柄速率进行连续、逐步递增负荷的最大运动测试。分别获取每次测试运动2.45至3分钟期间的VO₂和心率,并得出VO₂max和HRmax。进行双向方差分析和多重比较测试,以比较各组在VO₂max和HRmax方面的差异。年龄用作分类变量。

结果

健全受试者的最大生理反应优于轮椅使用者,但轮椅使用者组之间未显示出任何显著差异。有氧能力随着年龄增长而下降,对于轮椅使用者来说这种下降更为明显。还得出了年龄预测VO₂max和HRmax的方程。

解读与结论

由于轮椅使用者使用了四种不同的推进系统,预计这会导致使用者生理变量的变化。但研究结果表明没有显著差异。这表明轮椅使用者可能已经形成了某些自我调节机制,以克服不同推进系统引起的变化。

相似文献

1
Effect of chronic use of different propulsion systems in wheelchair design on the aerobic capacity of Indian users.轮椅设计中不同推进系统的长期使用对印度使用者有氧能力的影响。
Indian J Med Res. 2005 Jun;121(6):747-58.
2
Physiological response to the ambulatory performance of hand-rim and arm-crank propulsion systems.对手轮缘和手臂曲柄推进系统动态性能的生理反应。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001 Jul-Aug;38(4):391-9.
3
Arm crank vs handrim wheelchair propulsion: metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses.手摇曲柄与手轮圈轮椅推进:代谢及心肺反应
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983 Jun;64(6):249-54.
4
Physical fitness training for wheelchair ambulation by the arm crank propulsion technique.通过手摇曲柄推进技术进行轮椅步行的体能训练。
Clin Rehabil. 2001 Apr;15(2):125-32. doi: 10.1191/026921501666069173.
5
Comparison of the 6-Min Propulsion and Arm Crank Ergometer Tests to Assess Aerobic Fitness in Manual Wheelchair Users With a Spinal Cord Injury.比较 6 分钟推进和手臂曲柄测功计测试在评估脊髓损伤的手动轮椅使用者的有氧健身能力。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Dec;99(12):1099-1108. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001534.
6
Degree of coordination between breathing and rhythmic arm movements during hand rim wheelchair propulsion.手动轮椅推进过程中呼吸与有节奏的手臂运动之间的协调程度。
Int J Sports Med. 2006 Jan;27(1):67-74. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-837486.
7
Mechanical efficiency of two commercial lever-propulsion mechanisms for manual wheelchair locomotion.两种用于手动轮椅移动的商用杠杆推进机制的机械效率。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(10):1363-72. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.02.0034.
8
Thermoregulatory and physiological responses of wheelchair athletes to prolonged arm crank and wheelchair exercise.轮椅运动员对长时间手臂曲柄运动和轮椅运动的体温调节及生理反应。
Int J Sports Med. 1999 Oct;20(7):457-63. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-8831.
9
Wheelchair charity: a useless benevolence in community-based rehabilitation.轮椅慈善事业:社区康复中一项无用的善举。
Disabil Rehabil. 2005 May 20;27(10):591-6. doi: 10.1080/09638280400018387.
10
Mechanical efficiency during hand-rim wheelchair propulsion: effects of base-line subtraction and power output.手动轮椅轮圈推进过程中的机械效率:基线减法和功率输出的影响
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2004 May;19(4):343-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.01.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Wheelchair ergonomic hand drive mechanism use improves wrist mechanics associated with carpal tunnel syndrome.轮椅人体工程学手驱动机构的使用改善了与腕管综合征相关的手腕力学。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(10):1515-24. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.09.0211.
2
Comparison of metabolic cost, performance, and efficiency of propulsion using an ergonomic hand drive mechanism and a conventional manual wheelchair.使用符合人体工程学的手驱动机构和传统手动轮椅比较推进的代谢成本、性能和效率。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3):546-51. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.238. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
3
Body composition modifications in people with chronic spinal cord injury after supervised physical activity.
慢性脊髓损伤患者在接受监督的体育活动后的身体成分变化。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2011 Nov;34(6):586-93. doi: 10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000038.