Hoft Daniel F, Eickhoff Chris S
Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center, 3635 Vista Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Infect Immun. 2005 Aug;73(8):4934-40. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.8.4934-4940.2005.
It has been hypothesized that optimal vaccine immunity against mucosally invasive, intracellular pathogens may require the induction of different types of immune responses in mucosal and systemic lymphoid tissues. Mucosal type 2/3 responses (producing interleukin-4 [IL-4], IL-6 and/or transforming growth factor beta) could be necessary for optimal induction of protective secretory immunoglobulin A responses. On the other hand, systemic type 1 responses (including gamma interferon [IFN-gamma], tumor necrosis factor alpha, and optimal cytotoxic T-cell responses) are likely to be critical for protection against the disseminated intracellular replication that occurs after mucosal invasion. Despite these predictions, we recently found that vaccines inducing highly polarized type 1 immunity in both mucosal and systemic tissues provided optimal mucosal and systemic protection against the protozoan pathogen Trypanosoma cruzi. To further address this important question in a second model system, we now have studied the capacity of knockout mice to develop protective immune memory. T. cruzi infection followed by nifurtimox treatment rescue was used to immunize CD4, CD8, beta2-microglobulin, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), IL-12, IFN-gamma, and IL-4 knockout mice. Despite the previously demonstrated importance of CD4(+) T cells, CD8(+) T cells, and nitric oxide for T. cruzi immunity, CD4, CD8, and iNOS knockout mice developed mucosal and systemic protective immunity. However, IL-12, IFN-gamma, and beta2-microglobulin-deficient mice failed to develop mucosal or systemic protection. In contrast, IL-4 knockout mice developed maximal levels of both mucosal and systemic immune protection. These results strongly confirm our earlier conclusion from studies with polarizing vaccination protocols that type 1 immunity provides optimal mucosal and systemic protection against a mucosally invasive, intracellular pathogen.
据推测,针对黏膜侵袭性细胞内病原体的最佳疫苗免疫可能需要在黏膜和全身淋巴组织中诱导不同类型的免疫反应。黏膜2/3型反应(产生白细胞介素-4 [IL-4]、IL-6和/或转化生长因子β)对于最佳诱导保护性分泌型免疫球蛋白A反应可能是必要的。另一方面,全身1型反应(包括γ干扰素 [IFN-γ]、肿瘤坏死因子α和最佳细胞毒性T细胞反应)可能对于抵抗黏膜侵袭后发生的播散性细胞内复制至关重要。尽管有这些预测,但我们最近发现,在黏膜和全身组织中诱导高度极化1型免疫的疫苗能提供针对原生动物病原体克氏锥虫的最佳黏膜和全身保护。为了在第二个模型系统中进一步解决这个重要问题,我们现在研究了基因敲除小鼠产生保护性免疫记忆的能力。用克氏锥虫感染后经硝呋莫司治疗挽救的方法来免疫CD4、CD8、β2-微球蛋白、诱导型一氧化氮合酶(iNOS)、IL-12、IFN-γ和IL-4基因敲除小鼠。尽管先前已证明CD4(+) T细胞、CD8(+) T细胞和一氧化氮对克氏锥虫免疫很重要,但CD4、CD8和iNOS基因敲除小鼠仍产生了黏膜和全身保护性免疫。然而,IL-12、IFN-γ和β2-微球蛋白缺陷型小鼠未能产生黏膜或全身保护。相比之下,IL-4基因敲除小鼠产生了最大水平的黏膜和全身免疫保护。这些结果有力地证实了我们早期采用极化疫苗接种方案研究得出的结论,即1型免疫为抵抗黏膜侵袭性细胞内病原体提供了最佳的黏膜和全身保护。