Curtis-Fawley Sarah, Daly Kathleen
Royal Adelaide Hospital.
Violence Against Women. 2005 May;11(5):603-38. doi: 10.1177/1077801205274488.
The use of restorative justice for gendered violence has been debated in the feminist literature for some time. Critics warn that it is inappropriate because the process and outcomes are not sufficiently formal or stringent, and victims may be revictimized. Proponents assert that a restorative justice process may be better for victims than court because it holds offenders accountable and gives victims greater voice. This article presents what victim advocates in two Australian states think about using restorative justice for gendered violence. We find that although victim advocates have concerns and reservations about restorative justice, most saw positive elements.
一段时间以来,女权主义文献一直在讨论恢复性司法在性别暴力问题上的应用。批评者警告说,这是不合适的,因为该过程和结果不够正式或严格,受害者可能会再次受到伤害。支持者则断言,恢复性司法程序对受害者来说可能比法庭审判更好,因为它让犯罪者承担责任,并给予受害者更大的话语权。本文介绍了澳大利亚两个州的受害者权益倡导者对于在性别暴力问题上使用恢复性司法的看法。我们发现,尽管受害者权益倡导者对恢复性司法有所担忧和保留意见,但大多数人都看到了其中的积极因素。