Suppr超能文献

性别暴力与恢复性司法:受害者权益倡导者的观点

Gendered violence and restorative justice: the views of victim advocates.

作者信息

Curtis-Fawley Sarah, Daly Kathleen

机构信息

Royal Adelaide Hospital.

出版信息

Violence Against Women. 2005 May;11(5):603-38. doi: 10.1177/1077801205274488.

Abstract

The use of restorative justice for gendered violence has been debated in the feminist literature for some time. Critics warn that it is inappropriate because the process and outcomes are not sufficiently formal or stringent, and victims may be revictimized. Proponents assert that a restorative justice process may be better for victims than court because it holds offenders accountable and gives victims greater voice. This article presents what victim advocates in two Australian states think about using restorative justice for gendered violence. We find that although victim advocates have concerns and reservations about restorative justice, most saw positive elements.

摘要

一段时间以来,女权主义文献一直在讨论恢复性司法在性别暴力问题上的应用。批评者警告说,这是不合适的,因为该过程和结果不够正式或严格,受害者可能会再次受到伤害。支持者则断言,恢复性司法程序对受害者来说可能比法庭审判更好,因为它让犯罪者承担责任,并给予受害者更大的话语权。本文介绍了澳大利亚两个州的受害者权益倡导者对于在性别暴力问题上使用恢复性司法的看法。我们发现,尽管受害者权益倡导者对恢复性司法有所担忧和保留意见,但大多数人都看到了其中的积极因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验