• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更多资源带来更健康?跨国视角。

More resources better health? A cross-national perspective.

作者信息

Kim K, Moody P M

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40508-0086.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 1992 Apr;34(8):837-42. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90253-m.

DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90253-m
PMID:1604375
Abstract

This study is an attempt to examine the relative importance of health care resources in predicting infant mortality within industrialized, developing, and underdeveloped countries. The analyses were based on the data of 117 countries. Findings from this study suggest that health resources as a whole do not make a significant contribution to accounting for the variance of infant mortality rates over and above the variance accounted for by socioeconomic resources only. The contribution of health resources to the health of the population as a whole is really rather small in comparison to the role of socioeconomic resources.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨医疗保健资源在预测工业化国家、发展中国家和欠发达国家婴儿死亡率方面的相对重要性。分析基于117个国家的数据。该研究的结果表明,总体而言,医疗资源在解释婴儿死亡率方差方面,相较于仅由社会经济资源所解释的方差,并没有做出显著贡献。与社会经济资源的作用相比,医疗资源对总体人口健康的贡献实际上相当小。

相似文献

1
More resources better health? A cross-national perspective.更多资源带来更健康?跨国视角。
Soc Sci Med. 1992 Apr;34(8):837-42. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90253-m.
2
Technical efficiency in the use of health care resources: a comparison of OECD countries.医疗保健资源使用中的技术效率:经合组织国家比较
Health Policy. 2004 Jul;69(1):55-72. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.12.002.
3
The effect of changes in health sector resources on infant mortality in the short-run and the long-run: a longitudinal econometric analysis.卫生部门资源变化对短期和长期婴儿死亡率的影响:一项纵向计量经济学分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Jun;68(11):1918-25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.023. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
4
Economics of health planning--Costa Rica as an example.卫生规划经济学——以哥斯达黎加为例。
Scand J Soc Med Suppl. 1991;46:110-4.
5
The indicators used to monitor the progress of the Population Development Programme in South Africa.用于监测南非人口发展计划进展情况的指标。
South Afr J Demogr. 1990 Jul;3:33-6.
6
Is more neonatal intensive care always better? Insights from a cross-national comparison of reproductive care.更多的新生儿重症监护就一定更好吗?来自生殖护理跨国比较的见解。
Pediatrics. 2002 Jun;109(6):1036-43. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.6.1036.
7
Oil-exporting status, quality of life, and fertility: a cross national study.石油出口状况、生活质量与生育率:一项跨国研究。
Genus. 1982 Jul-Dec;38(3-4):129-44.
8
The Soviet country profile: health of the U.S.S.R. population in the 70s and 80s--an approach to a comprehensive analysis.苏联国情简介:20世纪70年代和80年代苏联人口的健康状况——一种综合分析方法
Soc Sci Med. 1990;31(8):867-77. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90023-l.
9
Social capital, life expectancy and mortality: a cross-national examination.社会资本、预期寿命与死亡率:一项跨国研究
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Jun;56(12):2367-77. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00241-1.
10
Human development index as a predictor of infant and maternal mortality rates.人类发展指数作为婴儿死亡率和孕产妇死亡率的预测指标。
J Pediatr. 1997 Sep;131(3):430-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)80070-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of general practitioners and specialists on mortality: a longitudinal study.全科医生和专科医生对死亡率的影响:一项纵向研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):785. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12919-y.
2
Public funding and young children vaccination coverage: Evidence from Socialist-Oriented Market Economy.公共资金与幼儿疫苗接种覆盖率:来自社会主义导向市场经济的证据
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Nov 20;14(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00569-5.
3
Heterogeneity in health funding and disparities in health outcome: a comparison between high focus and non-high focus states in India.
卫生资金的异质性与健康结果的差异:印度高关注邦与非高关注邦的比较。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Jul 17;21(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00451-x.
4
Association between inequalities in human resources for health and all cause and cause specific mortality in 172 countries and territories, 1990-2019: observational study.1990-2019 年 172 个国家和地区卫生人力不平等与全因和特定原因死亡率的关系:观察性研究。
BMJ. 2023 May 10;381:e073043. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073043.
5
The impact of ambulatory care spending, continuity and processes of care on ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations.门诊护理支出、连续性和护理流程对门诊护理敏感住院的影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Nov;23(8):1329-1340. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01428-y. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
6
The association between medical spending and health status: A study of selected African countries.医疗支出与健康状况之间的关联:对部分非洲国家的研究。
Malawi Med J. 2020 Mar;32(1):37-44. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v32i1.8.
7
Influencing Factors and Countermeasures of the Health of Residents in the City Clusters Along the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River.长江中游城市群居民健康的影响因素及对策
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Apr 10;8(2):93. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020093.
8
Hypertension Treatment Rates and Health Care Worker Density.高血压治疗率与医护人员密度。
Hypertension. 2019 Mar;73(3):594-601. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11995.
9
Health care expenditure and health outcome nexus: new evidence from the SAARC-ASEAN region.卫生保健支出与健康结果的关系:来自南盟-东盟地区的新证据。
Global Health. 2018 Nov 22;14(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0430-1.
10
Does the density of the health workforce predict adolescent health? A cross-sectional, multilevel study of 38 countries.卫生人力密度是否能预测青少年健康?对 38 个国家的横断面、多水平研究。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Mar 1;41(1):e35-e43. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy096.