Young Andrew M J, Moran Paula M, Joseph Michael H
Behavioural Neuroscience Group, School of Psychology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005;29(6):963-76. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.02.004.
It is well established that dopamine is released in the nucleus accumbens (NAC) in animals in rewarding or reinforcing situations, and widely believed that this release is the substrate of, or at least closely related to, the experience of reward. The demonstration of conditioned release of dopamine by stimuli conditioned to primary rewards has reinforced this view. However, a number of observations do not sit comfortably with this interpretation, most notably that dopamine is released equally effectively in NAC by aversive stimuli, and stimuli conditioned to them. Furthermore, additional release of dopamine is seen during conditioning, even if motivational stimuli of either type are not involved. It is suggested here that one important action of NAC dopamine release is to restore the salience of potential conditioned stimuli, when this has been reduced by prior un-reinforced experience. The paradigm of latent inhibition (LI) demonstrates a behavioural effect of this type, and extensive studies on the role of dopamine in LI have been undertaken by us and others. Those studies are reviewed here, together with some previously unpublished data, to demonstrate that (1) amphetamine disruption of LI is indeed a function of calcium-dependant dopamine release in the NAC at the time of conditioning; (2) other drugs acting on LI via changes in dopamine transmission act at the same locus; (3) the disruptive effect of indirect dopamine agonists on LI can be prevented by either D-1 selective receptor antagonists, or D-2 selective receptor antagonists. It is concluded that dopamine release in these very varied behavioural contexts (reward, punishment, conditioning, modulation of salience) must be differentiated in some way, and that this should be investigated. An alternative explanation, if they are not differentiated, would be that the release in fact does have the same functional significance in each case. We suggest that this common significance might be the broadening of attention to take in potentially conditionable stimuli, which have previously been devalued.
众所周知,在动物处于奖励或强化情境时,多巴胺会在伏隔核(NAC)中释放,并且人们普遍认为这种释放是奖励体验的基础,或者至少与之密切相关。通过与初级奖励相关的刺激来证明多巴胺的条件性释放,进一步强化了这一观点。然而,一些观察结果与这种解释并不相符,最明显的是,厌恶刺激以及与之相关的刺激在NAC中释放多巴胺的效果同样显著。此外,即使不涉及任何一种类型的动机性刺激,在条件反射过程中也会观察到多巴胺的额外释放。本文提出,NAC中多巴胺释放的一个重要作用是,当潜在条件刺激的显著性因先前未强化的经历而降低时,恢复其显著性。潜伏抑制(LI)范式就证明了这种类型的行为效应,我们和其他人已经对多巴胺在LI中的作用进行了广泛研究。本文将对这些研究进行综述,并结合一些之前未发表的数据,以证明:(1)安非他明对LI的破坏作用确实是在条件反射时NAC中钙依赖性多巴胺释放的结果;(2)其他通过改变多巴胺传递来作用于LI的药物也作用于同一部位;(3)间接多巴胺激动剂对LI的破坏作用可以被D-1选择性受体拮抗剂或D-2选择性受体拮抗剂所阻断。得出的结论是,在这些非常不同的行为情境(奖励、惩罚、条件反射、显著性调节)中,多巴胺的释放必须以某种方式加以区分,并且应该对此进行研究。如果它们没有被区分,另一种解释是,事实上这种释放在每种情况下都具有相同的功能意义。我们认为,这种共同意义可能是扩大对先前已贬值的潜在可条件化刺激的关注。